Container
|
Title
|
|
November 10, 1977 Session
|
|
Tape/Side
1/1
Time
00:00
|
Introduction
|
|
Tape/Side
1/1
Time
00:30
|
Initial Involvement in Textile Industry and Textile Unionism : Wanted to become lawyer. In 1932, while attending law school, went to work in dye house. On seeing people employed with large families and making only about $8 per week, decided something should be done. In January 1933, successfully organized Local 1790 in New York City; became its first president and later its first manager.
|
|
Tape/Side
1/1
Time
02:15
|
Organization of Dyeing Industry in New York City Greater Metropolitan Area : While he was involved in organizing New York City dyers, a simultaneous, independent drive was going on in the Paterson-Passaic, New Jersey area. Joseph Yannarelli of the United Textile Workers (UTW) was organizing in New Jersey; his pay was fifty cents of the one dollar initiation fee. New York City dyers organized themselves, rejected invitation of the Communist textile union (National Textile Workers Union), and obtained UTW charter in spring 1933.
|
|
Tape/Side
1/1
Time
03:50
|
Strike in September 1933 : Both in Paterson and New York City. Joint negotiations impossible - difference in demands. Paterson settled first; New York City then demanded, and received, the same contract.
|
|
Tape/Side
1/1
Time
05:50
|
Initial Organization Easy : No outside help. A combination of NRA, people being aware of the low wages they received, and work conditions in dye house all contributed to the relative ease of organizing.
|
|
Tape/Side
1/1
Time
06:45
|
Help from Other Labor Unions During the Six-Weeks' Strike of September 1933 : No help from UTW. Solicited donations from other unions which were very helpful.
|
|
Tape/Side
1/1
Time
07:20
|
Biographical Information : Born July 25, 1911 in New Jersey, the fifth of eight children. Parents immigrated to the United States, and met here. Father had purchased a farm to supplement the income he received as a poultry laborer. At the age of five, family moved to the east side of New York City. Married in 1939; one son.
|
|
Tape/Side
1/1
Time
10:45
|
Choice of Law as a Profession : Originally wanted to become an engineer, but being Jewish precluded this at that time. Instead chose law because his religion would not hinder his advancement in that profession. Finished law school (St. John's University) while serving as president of the Local.
|
|
Tape/Side
1/1
Time
11:55
|
Somewhat Influenced by Family Involvement in Labor : Sister was organizer for Millinery Workers Union; father was occasional member of unions.
|
|
Tape/Side
1/1
Time
12:20
|
Working Conditions in Dye House in Early 1930s : Developed strong sympathy for fellow workers. Worst job he ever experienced. Worked 52½ hours, 5½ days a week. He, as a skilled worker, was making good wages - $16 a week. Dye houses cheated on NRA-set hours and wages; there was no one to enforce the law.
|
|
Tape/Side
1/1
Time
13:25
|
Provisions of the First Contract in September 1933 - Union Recognition and 57½ Cents Per Hour : See also 22:55 of this Tape #1, Side 1.
|
|
Tape/Side
1/1
Time
14:05
|
Became Manager of Local 1790 in November 1933 (Had Been President Since March 1933); Due To Structural Change in the Local
|
|
Tape/Side
1/1
Time
14:45
|
Dues Collection : Even though members had no extra money, they were willing to pay dues because of the importance of the union. No check-off needed. Many members were very militant; Gordon's law background very useful in restraining militancy which tended toward violence during 1933 strike.
|
|
Tape/Side
1/1
Time
15:50
|
Duties as Manager of the Local : Hired secretary; continued organizational efforts; membership went from 1500 to 2500 during strike.
|
|
Tape/Side
1/1
Time
16:30
|
Formation of Dyers Federation : As a result of the problems encountered with the strike of 1933 (poor method of negotiation, misunderstandings between New York City and Paterson, overall weakness of UTW), decision was made in 1934, particularly in Paterson, to form a federation, consisting of locals in Paterson, Lodi, Union City, Passaic, and New York City. First president was George Baldanzi; Gordon ran against him. Basic concern was the workload.
|
|
Tape/Side
1/1
Time
19:05
|
Initial Structure and Authority of the Dyers Federation : Aim was to compare individual job situations and on that basis jointly negotiate uniform contracts, so that no shop would undercut the conditions of another; a uniform workload was the big issue. Joint negotiating committees of all locals formed to bargain with employer associations. Each city had its own employer association; they consolidated only after the Federation negotiated an insurance package during World War II.
|
|
Tape/Side
1/1
Time
21:25
|
One of the Basic Functions of the Federation Was to Organize Outside the New York City Area - New England, New York State, and Pennsylvania
|
|
Tape/Side
1/1
Time
22:05
|
Position of the Federation and of Dye Workers During 1934 Textile Strike : With the first-year contract still in effect, the Dyers were not in favor of breaking it; but would strike, if necessary.
|
|
Tape/Side
1/1
Time
22:55
|
Dyers Strike of 1934 : More unity because of existence of the Federation. Got 66 cents per hour and some fringe benefits. 1933 strike, which raised wages from 32 cents to 57½ cents, had bad economic effect on the industry. Same problem after 1934 strike, which lasted six weeks.
|
|
Tape/Side
1/1
Time
24:20
|
Communists Strongly Influenced Dyers Local 1733 in Paterson : Caused some of the disagreement between Paterson and New York City prior to winning first contract.
|
|
Tape/Side
1/1
Time
25:00
|
Dyers Federation Position on the Formation of the Textile Workers Organizing Committee (TWOC) : Having very little regard for UTW, cooperated with TWOC efforts. Turned over jurisdiction of New York skein dyers to TWOC. Also permitted organization of dyers outside the Federation in other parts of the country.
|
|
Tape/Side
1/1
Time
26:45
|
Proportion of TWUA Dyers Not in the Federation : About 10 percent did not belong to the Federation. Sometimes difficult to ascertain under which jurisdiction shops belonged; these usually affiliated with a joint board rather than the Federation.
|
|
Tape/Side
1/1
Time
27:35
|
Why Separately Organizing the Skein Dyers Was a Mistake
|
|
Tape/Side
1/2
Time
00:00
|
Introduction
|
|
Tape/Side
1/2
Time
00:30
|
Further Explanation of Why a Mistake Made in Allowing TWOC to Organize Skein Dyers into New York Joint Board, Separate from Federation : Internal struggle for power developed which would never have been allowed to happen had they been in the Federation. Dissidents seceded with Gorman to American Federation of Labor (AFL). Strategic organizing blunder by Sol Barkin. Joint Board unable to service skein dyers as well as the Federation could have.
|
|
Tape/Side
1/2
Time
02:25
|
Role of Dyers Federation in TWOC Drive : Acted in a supportive role, supplying manpower and knowledge. Did not supply funds.
|
|
Tape/Side
1/2
Time
03:45
|
Structure of Dyers Federation : Top officers were president and secretary-treasurer, and seven or eight organizers. Had district councils similar to joint boards. Executive board.
|
|
Tape/Side
1/2
Time
05:25
|
Gordon's Role on TWUA Executive Council : Two representatives of Dyers Federation had been on UTW Executive Council, and this arrangement carried over to TWUA. Vague on why he selected as one of the Dyers Federation representatives. Had little direct contact with the International Union; handled dyers matters, jurisdictional disputes with TWUA, etc.
|
|
Tape/Side
1/2
Time
08:05
|
Dispute Within Dyers Federation Developed Over Bonus System in 1946-1947 : United Piece Dye Works (Lodi, New Jersey) instituted a bonus system which the Federation opposed. Caused split in the Federation with people lining up with either Federation President Joe Knapik or George Baldanzi (former Federation President and then TWUA Executive Vice President). One Lodi leader shot. Fight carried to the TWUA Executive Council where Baldanzi held TWUA support against Knapik and the Federation. Gordon sided with Knapik.
|
|
Tape/Side
1/2
Time
11:00
|
Expulsion of Hosiery Federation from International Union as It Related to Dyers Federation : Dyers Federation was not concerned with the Hosiery Federation. Felt each Federation could take care of itself.
|
|
Tape/Side
1/2
Time
11:35
|
Gordon Feels That if Dyers Federation Had Not Split, International Union Could Not Have Dissolved the Federation
|
|
Tape/Side
1/2
Time
12:00
|
The Actual Split Within Dyers Federation : Largest local (1733) supported Baldanzi; Lodi local was split. Majority of others supported Knapik. The bonus system was no longer an issue; personalities and politics at issue now.
|
|
Tape/Side
1/2
Time
12:50
|
Explanation of Bonus System : During World War II, bonus paid to the workers and also to some officials of the Local. Hard feelings developed over who was being paid what.
|
|
Tape/Side
1/2
Time
13:20
|
More on the Dispute Within Dyers Federation : Bonus system just one cause of the dispute; a spark which was played up for political purposes. Baldanzi unhappy with the way Federation being run by Knapik; wanted to use Federation as base to further his own aims within International Union. Baldanzi at one point ran against Knapik for Dyers presidency and lost by only one vote.
|
|
Tape/Side
1/2
Time
15:15
|
Dissolution of Dyers Federation : Gordon feels that Knapik went to Rieve, offered to give up his position within the Federation if the Federation was dissolved and became a division within International Union. Each side blamed the other for the dissolution. Knapik supporters agreed to dissolution in order to keep Baldanzi from taking over the Federation.
|
|
Tape/Side
1/2
Time
17:10
|
Gordon Feels Dissolution of Federation a Mistake : As a federation, Dyeing and Finishing workers would have had more solidarity and strength than as just another division within the International Union. As a division, had to contend with regional forces and regional directors' ambitions because divisional directors were on a par with regional directors, whereas the Federation had more clout as a semi-autonomous organization.
|
|
Tape/Side
1/2
Time
19:10
|
Baldanzi Fought Dissolution of Federation : Neither Baldanzi nor any of his group attended dissolution meeting because they did not have the votes to prevent dissolution. Gordon feels this event was one cause leading to split between Baldanzi and Rieve.
|
|
Tape/Side
1/2
Time
20:05
|
Possible Politics in Dissolution of Federation : Rieve favored dissolution of Dyers Federation as it removed Baldanzi's base, was good for International Union, and gave him opportunity to appoint as Division Director a man who was opposed to Baldanzi-Gordon.
|
|
Tape/Side
1/2
Time
20:40
|
As Director Gordon Not Supposed to Visit Lodi or Paterson - the Baldanzi Strongholds - Until Tempers Had Subsided
|
|
Tape/Side
1/2
Time
21:05
|
Gordon Not Appointed Director of the Division Immediately after Dissolution in 1948 : Herbert Payne, a non-dyer, appointed director so that neither faction in the Dyers could object. Payne permitted to choose his own assistant, who would actually run the Dyeing Division. Probably with considerable Rieve input, Gordon was selected as Assistant Director. Reaction to appointment of Gordon or other Knapik supporter as Director would have been too violent to be palatable.
|
|
Tape/Side
1/2
Time
25:35
|
Problem of Disposition of Federation Treasury after Dissolution : Rieve promised Local 1733 just prior to dissolution that he would split the treasury up amongst the Dyers locals. Subsequently, he claimed the Executive Council would not allow it. Gordon voted against dividing the treasury in retaliation for Local 1733's support of Baldanzi. Money was put into the International.
|
|
Tape/Side
2/1
Time
00:00
|
Introduction
|
|
Tape/Side
2/1
Time
00:30
|
Effect on the Workers of Major Technological Changes in Dyeing Industry, from the Beginnings of Dyers Federation Up to Mid-1950s : Modernization of machines and equipment intensified the work load. Dyers Federation maintained artificial restrictions on work loads while nonunion plants did not. This put organized plants at competitive disadvantage; Dyers Federation not very forward-looking in this respect.
|
|
Tape/Side
2/1
Time
02:40
|
Geographic Changes in Dyeing Industry : Dyeing of staple fabrics moved to southern nonunion plants earliest; this did not hurt the northern plants too much. It became worse when novelty fabrics as well as staple fabrics were moved south.
|
|
Tape/Side
2/1
Time
03:25
|
Decline of Dyeing Industry in New York-New Jersey Area : 5,000 to 6,000 people still employed whereas numbers once were 25,000 to 30,000. New York-New Jersey dyeing industry excels in special fabrics needing special treatment which are not done in long runs or large quantities. Workers got $1-$2 per hour more than in South.
|
|
Tape/Side
2/1
Time
06:00
|
Ethnic Changes in Dyeing Industry : Progression of Italians, Poles, Blacks, Puerto Ricans. Today the latter two groups make up 50 percent of dyeing industry. Although the most recent immigrants usually work in dye houses, wages are relatively even with the national average because of the strong Union. Despite the high wages, the most recent immigrants to the city fill the jobs because the work is so dirty.
|
|
Tape/Side
2/1
Time
08:00
|
Advantages of Dyeing Industry over Other Branches of the Textile Industry through the Years : Gordon feels Dyers far ahead of other branches. Technical changes in hosiery brought rapid decline of unionism. Novelty fabrics have kept Dyers going in New York metropolitan area at high wages, despite predictions of demise.
|
|
Tape/Side
2/1
Time
09:15
|
Explanation of Novelty Fabrics : High cost, low volume designs.
|
|
Tape/Side
2/1
Time
11:35
|
Strong Federation Put Dyers Way Ahead of Other Workers in the Textile Industry : Dyers were elite of textile industry in fringe benefits, industry-wide bargaining, pension plan, vacation, and wages; this has caused some resentment. TWUA pension fund patterned after Dyers pension fund.
|
|
Tape/Side
2/1
Time
14:00
|
Beginnings of Rieve-Baldanzi Split : Gordon feels the split already in the making with dissolution of Dyers Federation in 1948.
|
|
Tape/Side
2/1
Time
15:20
|
Basis for Split : Feels the supporters of Baldanzi and Rieve were the culprits more than the principals themselves; supporters of each side were looking for personal advancement. Issues were invented on both sides.
|
|
Tape/Side
2/1
Time
16:35
|
The Declining Industry Also a Cause for the Dispute : Contracting industry and declining union membership meant fewer staff positions available and less room for rapid advancement.
|
|
Tape/Side
2/1
Time
18:35
|
Reasons for Baldanzi's Susceptibility to the Pressure : Irrationality of a political fight.
|
|
Tape/Side
2/1
Time
19:00
|
Baldanzi and “Operation Dixie.” : Made allies in the South.
|
|
Tape/Side
2/1
Time
20:20
|
1950 Convention and Why Rieve Could Not Oust Baldanzi : Not enough preparation. Neutral line of thought tended to support Baldanzi; Baldanzi side simply had the better argument.
|
|
Tape/Side
2/1
Time
21:15
|
Why Rieve Forces Did Not Run Candidates Against Baldanzi Supporters in 1950 : Politically infeasible at the time. Baldanzi supporters on Executive Council were a small minority and had done nothing to warrant dumping.
|
|
Tape/Side
2/1
Time
22:25
|
Isadore Katz's Support for Baldanzi : May have been motivated by idealism; perhaps he just thought he had picked the winner.
|
|
Tape/Side
2/1
Time
24:20
|
TWUA Staff Mostly Favored Baldanzi : Thought Baldanzi more of an idealist and Rieve too practical.
|
|
Tape/Side
2/1
Time
24:45
|
Mariano Bishop : Good practical unionist, like John Chupka. Pushed Rieve.
|
|
Tape/Side
2/1
Time
25:50
|
TWUA Seniority : Larger divisions counted more. Industry vs. regional director. Most powerful directors were New England, Middle Atlantic, Cotton, Woolen.
|
|
Tape/Side
2/1
Time
26:55
|
Point of No Return in Rieve-Baldanzi Dispute Was 1950 Convention : Baldanzi group buoyed by success at 1950 convention and went for broke. Rieve group realized seriousness of situation and went all out.
|
|
Tape/Side
2/2
Time
00:00
|
Introduction
|
|
Tape/Side
2/2
Time
00:35
|
State of Union Between 1950 and 1952 : Business was conducted, but the political effect of each action was always given prime consideration. If something appeared politically dangerous, a rational reason for not doing it would be developed.
|
|
Tape/Side
2/2
Time
01:00
|
Baldanzi's Issue of Democracy in the Union : A political gimmick, since all realized the need for a strong presidency in the TWUA.
|
|
Tape/Side
2/2
Time
02:05
|
Politics Was the Cause of Staff People Being Fired after 1950 Convention
|
|
Tape/Side
2/2
Time
02:45
|
Top People Backing Rieve - Payne, Chupka, Bishop
|
|
Tape/Side
2/2
Time
03:05
|
Accusations of Fiscal Conservatism Against Baldanzi : Rieve accused Baldanzi of opposing first and second dues increases in 1940s, and of opposing the purchase of TWUA building. Baldanzi was an idealist, impractical, and a poor administrator; thus, opposed spending the workers' money on a building.
|
|
Tape/Side
2/2
Time
05:20
|
Baldanzi Accused of Undermining Executive Council Slate in 1948 : Many of the departments of TWUA were pushing slates. As Baldanzi supporter, Charlie Hughes was being pushed by Baldanzi for a position on Executive Council.
|
|
Tape/Side
2/2
Time
06:50
|
Gordon Recognized His Appointment as Assistant Dyers Division Director as an Early Political Move by Rieve
|
|
Tape/Side
2/2
Time
07:25
|
Southern Cotton Strike of 1951 : A political strike and should never have occurred. Between this strike and the internal fight, TWUA set back for years. Fault lay on both sides; politically dangerous to oppose the strike call; would never have been called in normal times.
|
|
Tape/Side
2/2
Time
09:50
|
Charge of Modern Unionism During the Strike's Postmortem : TWUA staff was not split by a philosophical approach to unionism, but by politics.
|
|
Tape/Side
2/2
Time
11:50
|
CIO Unions Did Little to Help During Southern Strike : Not because of the internal fight; rather just another example of the way CIO unions did not help each other. Only today are other unions beginning to appreciate the “Southern Conspiracy” TWUA has been up against. Labor beginning to realize today, in the fight against J.P. Stevens, that the various Internationals must stick together or sink separately, because now it affects them directly.
|
|
Tape/Side
2/2
Time
14:40
|
Why Baldanzi Allowed Himself to Be Maneuvered into Running an Opposition Slate at 1952 Convention : His supporters felt that, having done so well in 1950, success would continue with 1952. Rieve group also goaded Baldanzi into running a slate.
|
|
Tape/Side
2/2
Time
15:35
|
Baldanzi and the UTW : UTW expected 20,000-30,000 to bolt from TWUA. Pension fund held many Dyers in the TWUA.
|
|
Tape/Side
2/2
Time
16:40
|
Bishop's Election to Executive Vice President in 1952 : Rieve considered Bishop his successor and not Pollock. Bishop well respected within TWUA, while many had reservations about Pollock.
|
|
Tape/Side
2/2
Time
17:55
|
Selection of Executive Vice President after Bishop's Death : Executive Council did not want Pollock; preferred Chupka; decided to establish multiple vice presidents. Rieve then reverted to Pollock, who wanted the position and was prepared to fight for it at the convention.
|
|
Tape/Side
2/2
Time
20:55
|
Rieve's Suggestion of an Executive Committee of the Executive Council after 1952 Convention : Would have been composed of the officers plus five or six vice presidents in the New York area. It was opposed by Executive Council for geographic reasons.
|
|
Tape/Side
2/2
Time
22:05
|
Staff Purge after 1952 : In retrospect, a serious mistake. Hueter and Hughes able to remain with the Union because they had independent power bases.
|
|
Tape/Side
2/2
Time
23:30
|
Fight Between TWUA and UTW Following 1952 Convention : United Mine Workers' loan to UTW either because of friendships with Baldanzi or an attempt to establish influence within UTW.
|
|
Tape/Side
2/2
Time
24:50
|
Difference in Administrations of Rieve and Pollock : Rieve practical; Pollock vengeful and not as good a leader. Union philosophy did not change.
|
|
Tape/Side
2/2
Time
26:20
|
Why TWUA Such a Clean Union : Strong leadership backed by a strong Executive Council; immediate action against anyone caught “fooling around.”
|
|
Tape/Side
2/2
Time
27:30
|
Change in Approach of TWUA to the South in Late 1950s; “Bargaining from Weakness” : The tape ran out when Gordon was being asked who conceived this “bargaining from weakness” approach. He could not give an answer.
: Leaflets, publicity - only way to get wage increases in order to protect wages and fringes in the North.
|
|