Container | Title |
---|
| 1975 April 23 | |
Tape/Side/Part
10/1/1 Time
00:00 | INTRODUCTION | |
Tape/Side/Part
10/1/1 Time
00:30 | DIFFICULTY IN UNIVERSITY PROGRAMS/DEPARTMENTS USING PUBLIC AND PRIVATE FUNDS : Policy decisions and freedom of speech can be affected by receiving either public or private funds. Safety depends on relative freedom of pursuit.
| |
Tape/Side/Part
10/1/1 Time
03:50 | PUBLIC AFFAIRS DISCUSSION PROGRAM PROMOTES FREEDOM OF SPEECH : Public affairs discussion programs began so state groups would have basis to discuss alternative solutions to a problem. Resource materials for public affairs problems included the bulletin How to Conduct Group Discussion, and such subject matter guides as How Can the Buyer Get the Money's Worth?; Is Dairying Doomed in Wisconsin?; Who Should Pay the Doctor Bills?
| |
Tape/Side/Part
10/1/1 Time
11:00 | CONTROVERSY OVER WHO SHOULD PAY THE DOCTOR BILLS? : Became controversial because one alternative solution involved organization around consumer cooperatives. Other proposed alternatives included socialized medicine and individual responsibility through personal funds or insurance plans.
| |
Tape/Side/Part
10/1/1 Time
12:25 | SUPPORT FOR PUBLIC AFFAIRS DISCUSSIONS : Statewide support for public affairs discussions.
| |
Tape/Side/Part
10/1/1 Time
13:10 | OPPOSITION TO PUBLIC AFFAIRS DISCUSSION PROGRAMS : American Medical Association through State Medical Society opposed public affairs discussions on Who Should Pay the Doctor Bills? President Frank and U.W. Regents vindicated Wileden on the issue.
| |
Tape/Side/Part
10/1/1 Time
15:30 | DEPARTMENT OF RURAL SOCIOLOGY DISCONTINUES PUBLIC AFFAIRS DISCUSSIONS : Public affairs discussions dropped; not considered logical part of sociology. General support outside but not within department.
| |
Tape/Side/Part
10/1/1 Time
18:45 | REPRIMAND FOR REPORTING FAILURES AS WELL AS SUCCESSES : Required to submit annual reports to federal government, and monthly reports to state. Warned repeatedly that reporting failures as well as accomplishments would jeopardize continuation of funding.
| |
Tape/Side/Part
10/1/1 Time
24:45 | COMMENTS ON FEDERAL EXTENSION ANNUAL REPORTS : Challenges worthwhileness of information.
| |
Tape/Side/Part
10/1/1 Time
29:30 | BACKGROUND OF FARM SHORT COURSE : Begun in 1880's by Professor Moore in agronomy, coincidentally with Farmers Institutes to disseminate information to state farmers. Winter short courses held at the College of Agriculture for farm boys and girls.
| |
Tape/Side/Part
10/1/2 Time
00:00 | INTRODUCTION | |
Tape/Side/Part
10/1/2 Time
00:25 | CONTINUATION OF DISCUSSION OF FARM SHORT COURSE : Three five-week terms. In early years, enrollees usually not high school graduates; later most had high school diplomas. Usually took two years to complete course. Many of Wisconsin's best farmers graduates of farm short course, which Wileden taught between years 1926-1940; 1945-1951; 1954-1956.
| |
Tape/Side/Part
10/1/2 Time
04:50 | DIFFERENCES IN TEACHING SHORT COURSE AND RESIDENT INSTRUCTION : Short Course students “fresh off the farm, full of energy and enthusiasm, and they were anything but a captive audience.” Short course considered “low-level teaching” by some professors; difficult for farm short course directors to recruit good teachers.
| |
Tape/Side/Part
10/1/2 Time
07:50 | DECLINE IN INTEREST IN FARM SHORT COURSE : Introduction of Smith-Hughes agricultural teaching in high schools led to decline in interest in farm short course. Dean Christiansen attempted to revive course by hiring John Barton, experienced with Danish folk schools, but failed in attempt to apply Danish folk school philosophy to short course.
| |
Tape/Side/Part
10/1/2 Time
14:00 | FARM SHORT COURSE RETURNS TO AGRICULTURAL FORMAT : Smith-Hughes teacher Frank Wilkinson became director; short course became a more concentrated form of what taught in high school. In 1950's the Department of Rural Sociology withdrew completely from farm short course.
| |
Tape/Side/Part
10/2/1 Time
00:00 | INTRODUCTION | |
Tape/Side/Part
10/2/1 Time
00:45 | WHY FARM SHORT COURSE TEACHING CONSIDERED “LOW-LEVEL” : Teachers in farm short course among the best in college of agriculture; Wileden believes many critics probably not effective enough individuals to teach a course where students walk out if disinterested.
| |
Tape/Side/Part
10/2/1 Time
03:05 | WILEDEN'S TECHNIQUE IN TEACHING FARM SHORT COURSE : Found out real concerns of students. Relevant discussions included such topics as marriage, type of farm they wanted to operate, role of child in farm family. Discussion format for classes; instructor presided rather than engage in professorial “speechmaking.”
| |
Tape/Side/Part
10/2/1 Time
06:50 | ACADEMIC TEACHING VS. SHORT COURSE INSTRUCTION : Academic instructor has captive audience, students need grade to help get degree; students in farm short course must be stimulated or they walk out.
| |
Tape/Side/Part
10/2/1 Time
07:35 | WORLD WAR II RURAL CIVILIAN DEFENSE PROGRAM IN WISCONSIN : Soon after Pearl Harbor, U.S. government set up rural and urban civilian defense programs. Focused on neighborhood leadership system plan. For Wisconsin rural areas, Extension Director Warren Clark asked county extension agents to submit names of two individuals from each “neighborhood” (e.g. one-room school district).
| |
Tape/Side/Part
10/2/1 Time
13:30 | JULIUS P. HEIL SETS UP VOLUNTEER WAR SERVICE COMMITTEE : Set up five-member volunteer war service committee for every Wisconsin community. Outdid federal government; issued to volunteers red, white, and blue badges which read, “I am a War Service Committee Member.”
| |
Tape/Side/Part
10/2/1 Time
15:45 | “GRAND CONFUSION” IN RURAL CIVILIAN DEFENSE PROGRAM : Dual programs created great confusion; “tons of instructions” issued for such duties as rationing meat, collecting scrap iron, selling government bonds, teaching nutrition. Several months of confusion led Warren Clark to ask Wileden to become state director of Rural Civilian Defense Program. County extension agents disgusted with the confusion over two “unreconcilable systems.” Wileden tried to reconcile regional and state meetings with local volunteers; also devised a guide. Confusion worsened when county agents selected representatives instead of setting up election mechanism; resulted in inexperienced representatives.
| |
Tape/Side/Part
10/2/1 Time
24:15 | EVALUATION OF RURAL CIVILIAN DEFENSE PROGRAM : “The redeeming factor was that the fighting went so well on the military front that we never needed really to mobilize our volunteer resources.” Milkweed pod collecting among the projects. Wileden remained until war ended; job pre-empted other duties.
| |
Tape/Side/Part
10/2/1 Time
29:30 | ANECDOTE ABOUT MARTIN ANDERSON TRANSPORTING HAMS TO THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS : Commander of liberty ships that took hams to the Philippines.
| |
Tape/Side/Part
10/2/2 Time
00:00 | INTRODUCTION | |
Tape/Side/Part
10/2/2 Time
00:30 | BACKGROUND OF COMMUNITY STUDIES : Community studies provided “classroom laboratory” for urban and foreign students to experience rural life at first hand. Students studied different aspects of a selected, close-by community and “really felt that they were a part of America; the real Midwest America.” [The State Historical Society of Wisconsin has in its collections seventeen of the eighteen community studies; the exception is New Glarus.]
| |
Tape/Side/Part
10/2/2 Time
07:50 | SYNCHRONIZED SLIDES AND RECORDINGS : Developed synchronized colored slides and voice recordings [also at the State Historical Society of Wisconsin] to loan to organizations throughout state. Five programs developed; distributed by rural sociology office. Several copied by USDA, AID, and the UN. Bought own equipment and supplies to prepare pilot and demonstrate effectiveness in order to get additional resources. Project discontinued when Wileden retired.
| |
Tape/Side/Part
10/2/2 Time
19:15 | BACKGROUND OF FRENCH ISLAND PROJECT : Wileden looking for community development pilot project; saw French Island as unique opportunity because it was a rural suburb, near La Crosse.
| |
Tape/Side/Part
10/2/2 Time
22:45 | DESCRIPTION OF FRENCH ISLAND ABOUT : Very old settlement where many residents had “squatter's rights.” La Crosse residents disinterested; a “red light” district and the city dump. Low land flooded in each spring; packs of dogs and plentiful rats; ramshackle school. La Crosse population growing; French Island needed for expansion. [1] | |
Tape/Side/Part
10/2/2 Time
30:05 | JACK JENNINGS REQUESTS HELP TO IMPROVE FRENCH ISLAND : Jennings retired from Army Corps of Engineers, owned marina, and envisioned better future for French Island. Requested help from University of Wisconsin. French island school principal shared Jennings vision.
| |
Tape/Side/Part
10/2/2 Time
33:15 | MAJORITY OF RESIDENTS RESIST CHANGE : Town chairman led French Island residents who opposed any changes.
| |