Container
|
Title
|
|
Series: Representation Files, 2003-2010
|
|
Box
1
Folder
1
|
Alfred Riley v. Doyle
|
|
Box
1
Folder
2-3
|
Allen, et al. v. Correction Corporation of America (CCA), et al.
|
|
|
Attorney General (AG)
|
|
Box
1
Folder
4
|
Correspondence, 2008-2010
|
|
Box
1
Folder
5
|
Litigation correspondence, 2004-2010
|
|
Box
1
Folder
6
|
Opinion letters
|
|
Box
1
Folder
7
|
Request for AG opinion on Title IV-E funds
|
|
Box
1
Folder
8-9
|
Average Wholesale Price (AWP) litigation, Medicaid pharmaceuticals
|
|
Box
4
Folder
1
|
Miner, Barnhill & Galland/AWP issues : Restricted due to the presence of attorney client privileged information (Wis. Stats. 905.03).
|
|
Box
1
Folder
10
|
Memorandum, Miner, Barnhill & Galland, P.C.
|
|
Box
1
Folder
11
|
Newark Group Telco decision
|
|
Box
1
Folder
12
|
Burnette small claims
|
|
Box
1
Folder
13
|
Chenequa, Village of
|
|
Box
1
Folder
14
|
Chenequa Land Conservancy Inc.
|
|
Box
1
Folder
15
|
Chenequa v. Hartland
|
|
Box
1
Folder
16
|
Clean Air Act notice of violation, 2002
|
|
Box
1
Folder
17
|
Coker v. Doyle, 2003
|
|
Box
1
Folder
18
|
Community Support Inc., 2009
|
|
Box
4
Folder
2
|
Credit Life Disability Insurance, Office of the Commissioner of Insurance (OCI) : Restricted due to the presence of attorney client privileged information (Wis. Stats. 905.03).
|
|
Box
1
Folder
19
|
Connecticut v. American Electric Power, public nuisance, utilities
|
|
Box
1
Folder
20-22
|
Dairyland Greyhound Park Inc., 2003
|
|
Box
1
Folder
23
|
Department of Justice
|
|
Box
1
Folder
24
|
Forest crop law tax collection, 2005
|
|
Box
1
Folder
25
|
Department of Revenue (DOR) cases
|
|
Box
4
Folder
3
|
Public Services Commission (PSC)-Wisconsin Advanced Telecommunications Foundation (WATF) case, 2005 : Restricted due to the presence of attorney client privileged information (Wis. Stats. 905.03).
|
|
Box
1
Folder
26
|
Representation request to DOJ
|
|
Box
1
Folder
27
|
Taycheedah Correctional Institution investigation, 2006
|
|
Box
1
Folder
28
|
Duluth/Superior Fire Services Mutual Aid agreement, 2005
|
|
Box
1
Folder
29
|
Emily Beaver, et al. v. State of Wisconsin, et al., U.S. District Court, Eastern District (ED) Wisconsin (No. 07-C-57)
|
|
Box
4
Folder
4
|
Enoch v. Tienor, et al., U.S. District Court, Eastern District, 2007 : Restricted due to the presence of attorney client privileged information (Wis. Stats. 905.03).
|
|
Box
4
Folder
5
|
Falk v. McCallum, Case no. 02-CV-2930, 2003 : Restricted due to the presence of attorney client privileged information (Wis. Stats. 905.03).
|
|
Box
4
Folder
6
|
Flynn v. Doyle (ACLU complaint) : Restricted due to the presence of attorney client privileged information (Wis. Stats. 905.03).
|
|
Box
1
Folder
30
|
Estate of Beverly Frawley, 2006
|
|
Box
4
Folder
7
|
Fromader v. Department of Workforce Development (DWD), 2008 : Restricted due to the presence of attorney client privileged information (Wis. Stats. 905.03).
|
|
Box
1
Folder
31-32
|
Gabriel Griffin and Inez Griffin v. State of Wisconsin, 2007
|
|
Box
1
Folder
33
|
Ho-Chunk Nation v. Doyle, et al. Dane County Case No. 08-CV-0368
|
|
Box
1
Folder
34
|
Household Finance Corporation, 2005
|
|
Box
4
Folder
8
|
Jamie S., et al. v. Milwaukee Board of School Directors, 2009 : Restricted due to the presence of attorney client privileged information (Wis. Stats. 905.03).
|
|
Box
4
Folder
9-10
|
Jeanine B., et al. v. Doyle, et al., Case No. 93-C-547 : Restricted due to the presence of attorney client privileged information (Wis. Stats. 905.03).
|
|
Box
1
Folder
35
|
Juza v. Meredith, et al., Dane County Case No. 06-CV-319
|
|
Box
4
Folder
11
|
Kenneth Kratz investigation, 2009-2010 : Restricted due to the presence of attorney client privileged information (Wis. Stats. 905.03).
|
|
Box
4
Folder
12
|
District Attorney Ken Kratz correspondence : Restricted due to the presence of attorney client privileged information (Wis. Stats. 905.03).
|
|
Box
4
Folder
13
|
Hearing regarding the removal of Calumet County District Attorney Kenneth Kratz, 2010 : Restricted due to the presence of attorney client privileged information (Wis. Stats. 905.03).
|
|
Box
4
Folder
14
|
Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant investigation, 2004-2007 : Restricted due to the presence of attorney client privileged information (Wis. Stats. 905.03).
|
|
Box
1
Folder
36
|
David Kranz v. State of Wisconsin, 2006
|
|
Box
1
Folder
37
|
Lencz v. Department of Health and Family Services (DHFS), 2003
|
|
Box
1
Folder
38
|
Lovejoy, et al. v. Crime Victims Rights Board complaint, 2005
|
|
Box
2
Folder
1
|
McCabe, et al. v. State Elections Board (Accenture), 2005
|
|
Box
2
Folder
2
|
McConkey v. Doyle, et al., Dane County Case No. 07-CV-2657
|
|
Box
2
Folder
3-4
|
Merck/Vioxx claim, 2005-2006
|
|
Box
4
Folder
15
|
Thimerosal issues, 2005 : Restricted due to the presence of attorney client privileged information (Wis. Stats. 905.03).
|
|
Box
2
Folder
5
|
Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of Commerce (MMAC) and Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce (WMC) v. Doyle and Gassman, 2010
|
|
Box
2
Folder
6
|
No call list, DOJ representation, 2003
|
|
Box
4
Folder
16
|
Northern Center closing (Sommerfeld v. Doyle) : Restricted due to the presence of attorney client privileged information (Wis. Stats. 905.03).
|
|
Box
2
Folder
7-8
|
Northern Center litigation
|
|
Box
4
Folder
17
|
Northern Wisconsin Center (NWC) lawsuit : Restricted due to the presence of attorney client privileged information (Wis. Stats. 905.03).
|
|
Box
4
Folder
18
|
Options for Community Growth v. Milwaukee, DHFS, et al., 2005 : Restricted due to the presence of attorney client privileged information (Wis. Stats. 905.03).
|
|
Box
4
Folder
19
|
Panzer v. Doyle (gaming compact), Case No. 03-910-0A : Restricted due to the presence of attorney client privileged information (Wis. Stats. 905.03).
|
|
Box
2
Folder
9-11
|
Dairyland
|
|
Box
2
Folder
12
|
Pierce v. Thiel, Case No. 02-CV-720 (Sauk County), 2004
|
|
Box
4
Folder
20
|
Pierce : Restricted due to the presence of attorney client privileged information (Wis. Stats. 905.03).
|
|
Box
2
Folder
13
|
Potawatomi Compact amendments, 2005
|
|
Box
2
Folder
14
|
PRN Associates v. State (Kenilworth)
|
|
Box
2
Folder
15
|
J.P. Pulliam Plant, notice of intent, 2005
|
|
Electronic Folder
|
Pulliam documents
|
|
Box
2
Folder
16
|
Quest/Nichols Institute Diagnostics settlement, Medicaid fraud, 2009
|
|
Box
4
Folder
21
|
Ready v. Doyle, et al., U.S. District Court, Eastern District Wisconsin : Restricted due to the presence of attorney client privileged information (Wis. Stats. 905.03).
|
|
Box
4
Folder
22
|
Risk management costs : Restricted due to the presence of attorney client privileged information (Wis. Stats. 905.03).
|
|
|
Scocos v. Department of Veterans Affairs (DVR), et al., Dane County Case No. 09-CV-6213
|
|
|
Emails for subpoena
|
|
Electronic Folder
|
Allen Larrivee, Rachel
|
|
Electronic Folder
|
Bennett, Michael
|
|
Electronic Folder
|
Boyce, Katie (2 copies)
|
|
Electronic Folder
|
Bundy, Maria
|
|
Electronic Folder
|
Butson, Coral
|
|
Electronic Folder
|
Dvorak, Shayla
|
|
Electronic Folder
|
Ernest, Samantha
|
|
Electronic Folder
|
Goodwin, Susan
|
|
Electronic Folder
|
Loredo, Shannon
|
|
Electronic Folder
|
Primakow, Jordan
|
|
Electronic Folder
|
Roh, Meghan/Stein, Brad
|
|
Electronic Folder
|
Russell, Angela
|
|
Electronic Folder
|
Zander, Carolyn
|
|
Electronic Folder
|
untitled
|
|
Box
4
Folder
23
|
Third party subpoena : Restricted due to the presence of attorney client privileged information (Wis. Stats. 905.03).
|
|
Box
4
Folder
24
|
Internal email and notes : Restricted due to the presence of attorney client privileged information (Wis. Stats. 905.03).
|
|
Box
2
Folder
17
|
Scocos discovery project
|
|
Box
2
Folder
18
|
Scocos subpoena search
|
|
Box
4
Folder
25
|
Subpoena : Restricted due to the presence of attorney client privileged information (Wis. Stats. 905.03).
|
|
Box
2
Folder
19-20
|
State v. Abbott Laboratories Inc., et al., Dane County Case No. 04-CV-1709
|
|
Box
4
Folder
26
|
State v. Creative Stepping Stones Inc., 2006 : Restricted due to the presence of attorney client privileged information (Wis. Stats. 905.03).
|
|
Box
4
Folder
27
|
U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency Standards lawsuit, 2003 : Restricted due to the presence of attorney client privileged information (Wis. Stats. 905.03).
|
|
Box
4
Folder
28
|
United States of America, et al. v. St Gobain Containers, 2009 : Restricted due to the presence of attorney client privileged information (Wis. Stats. 905.03).
|
|
Box
2
Folder
21
|
Upper Midwest Power request, 2005
|
|
Box
2
Folder
22
|
Williams v. Doyle, et al., Western District (WD) Case No. 06-C-0686-C
|
|
Box
2
Folder
23
|
Wisconsin Environmental Law Advocates (WELA) v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR)
|
|
Box
2
Folder
24
|
Wisconsin Power and Light (Prairie du Sac hydroelectric project)
|
|
Box
2
Folder
25
|
Wisconsin Realtors Association v. Department of Agriculture, Trade, and Consumer Protection (DACTP)
|
|
Box
4
Folder
29
|
Zien v. Marotta, Case No. 03-C-0223, Western District : Restricted due to the presence of attorney client privileged information (Wis. Stats. 905.03).
|
|