University of Wisconsin Digital Collections
Link to University of Wisconsin Digital Collections
Link to University of Wisconsin Digital Collections
The State of Wisconsin Collection

Page View

Transactions of the Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts and Letters
volume V (1877-1881)

Buel, Ira M.
The corals of Delafield,   pp. 185-193 PDF (2.5 MB)


Page 191


                      .T/e Corals of Delafeld.                191
present classed under the old genus because they have not been
proved to belong to any other genus, i. e., their manner of growth
has never been discovered.
   C atriltus, the first form noted under this designation, was first
described in the Ohio reports. It is distinguished by the presence
of small quadrangular, conical eminences, wLich are thickly
scattered over the surface of the coral, especially at the flattened
ends of the branches. The specimens from Ohio are described as
cylindrical, frequently branching forms, from four to seven lines
in diameter and eight to ten corallites in the space of one line.
Ours are much smaller, from one and a half to three lines in
diameter and flattened, with ten or twelve corallites in the space
of a line.  Clatdees Jamesi, described likewise in the Ohio re-
ports, has its representative here also. The walls of the corallite
cells in this form show the extraordinary thickness exhibited by
the Ohio form, but also show a well marked groove upon their
summit, a feature that is not noticed by Nicholsoa in his descrip-
tions, nor shown in a type specimen which I have examined from
that state. This feature has been before mentioned as a charac
teristic of the Bryozoan genus Trematopora.  C. fus~formis is a
new species (see An. Rep't, '76, p. 70). This is a very minute
form, less than an inch in length and an eighth of an inch in
diameter. The cells are very minute, twelve to twenty in the
space of a line. The cell walls are thick, sometimes with minute
pores, sometimes with a well marked groove on their summits,
and in other cases sharply ridged between the cells. The very
close resemblance that exists between this form and Tirematopora
annulife/a argues very strongly against their being placed in dif-
ferent sub kingdoms. I have failed to find any characteristic in
these two last species that should remove them from those of the
genus Trematojorc.
  I desire also to call attention to some undescribed and perhaps
previously unnoticed forms which I observed while classifying
the collections of the state survey.
  The first is a thin expansion found encrusting a fragment of a
Brachiopod shell. The cells in this form are rather larger than
those of a -y of the other species here noted, and seemed to be


Go up to Top of Page