Page View
[Land use planning reports; Wisconsin counties]
([1939/1942])
[Kenosha county land use planning], pp. [unnumbered]-22
PDF (8.5 MB)
Page 16
16 OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS A. Livestock Kenosha County at one time purchased nearly all of its replacement dairy cattle. More replacement stock is now being raised in the County. As a means of diversity, to encourage the breeding of better stock, and to give the farmer better stock with which to work, it is recommended that as much of the replacement stock be raised at home as possible. It was also the feeling of several of the committees that the farmers of tbte county are attempting to carry more livestock than is economical. It hi's been observed that those farmers who have four or more acres of land per livestock unit are usually the more prosperous farmers of the county. B. Diversity It was the concensus of opinion among the farmers in the dairy section of the county that too large a percentage of the income is from milk. On most farms other sources of income should be added, and present sources other than dairying should be enlarged so as to meke them large enough to be worth while. There should be cash crops and livestock for meat, breed4ng and work purposes. In addition to dairy cattle, there should be h -s, poultry, and where the danger from dogs is not to great, sheep. Some coimrnities feel that each farm should be more self-sufficient. In other ','ords, there should be enough vegetable,, meat, dairy and poultry products produced to furnish them more of the living. More of the food for the family should be canned or otherwise preserved for winter consumption. In the past, many good farmers have failed because of high living expenses. C. A.ASA. 1. Bases The universal comment on the A.A.A. was that basas are too low. Low bases tend to provent diversity. It was considered fair for a dairy farmer to have a 60 percent soil depleting allotment, and an 85 per- cent allotment for the truck farmer. The present allotment for the county is 53.3 percent. Kenosha County is level enough to be well suited to the growing of tilled crops. In the setting of bases, it was thought that more consideration should be given to the carrying capacity of permanent pastures. Sugar beet growers feel that all domestic consumed sugar should be home grown and that there should be no restriction on the acreage of sugar beets.
This material may be protected by copyright law (e.g., Title 17, US Code).| For information on re-use, see http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/Copyright