University of Wisconsin Digital Collections
Link to University of Wisconsin Digital Collections
Link to University of Wisconsin Digital Collections
The State of Wisconsin Collection

Page View

Build Wisconsin

Build Wisconsin [1925, no. 15],   pp. [1]-5 PDF (1.7 MB)

Page 5

Page 5
of the comic supplements. I don't moan to say that you can got rid of tho
supplement; it can't bo done. At least I havo not been able to do it in my
and I eonfems to you that I thoroughly enjoy "Mr. and Mrs." by
Briggs; it is so
much like home at times that it is almost heart-breaking.   These things
deal with the fundamental emoticns and interests are the things that after
in the long run do appeal to people.
      Newspapers are responsible, if you please, for the use that the American
people make of the English language. That is a sta~gcring rosionsibility.
the play, "So This Is London," it apparently was tho idca that
the only way to
lepict an American family by way of comparison with the British family was
iake the boy of tho family say "goe" and "kiddo" and
to assume that all tho moe -
:ers of the family, including editors of papers, are splendidly skilled gum-
chewers. We are now reaching that stage where we have a right to insist that
the world shall recognize that we have moved up on a higher plane, where
things are not actually a part of the thing that America idealizes.
                            Could Drop Some of Slang
   E DO not think we need to stoop to the low-brow journalism which uses
the slang of the day. I think we ought to get rid of some of the American
plotivos; it will have a bearing upon the nation as a whole in the interpreta-
tion that other nations have of us.   Newspapers are accepting the responsibility
very splendidly, particularly in their editorial columns.
      It seenms to me, however, that editors should not say that "We
must give
the people what they viant." I would challenge that unqualifiedly. Otherwise
we are caught ina vicious circle. The most powerful agency in American life
today has a duty to lead and to accept responsibility for the things which
make America what sho ought to be. I don't mean to say all should publish
Christian Science Monitors, but I do mean that the servile, supine, weak,
tiil-ontal acquiuscurce in the idea that newspapers must furnish the people
what they want is challungod by the fact that we don't know what people want.
It can be found every time that the American people will rcspond to something
that is at least a bit higher than what they have bocn accustomed to. People
in their best moments want something better than thoyaro.
                             Silence May be Convincing
      1HE newspaper that I like has the right emphasis; it has a certain
it gives evidence constantly that it is accepting its responsibilities. But
want to get to this: T.hat are its methods? Well, the paper I like, first
all, is the one that has the dignity every now and then quietly and silently
to ignore certain things. I don't mean that it should suppress the truth
any of its aspects, but I do mean that it should recognize that certain things
can best be disposed of by not paying the slightest attention to them. There
is running in my mind the phrase or sentence of some artise who said: "If
cannot praiso a picture, curse it; silence is the one thing I cannot stand."
That is the method for some people.
       And, finally, I like a newspaper which holds its readers to the recogni-
 tion that there Ls in the universe a line and that on the one side of it
 are wrong, and on the other side things are right; that the American people
 insist upon the recognition of moral issues; and that selfish, aggressive
 interests that dominate the people shall be attacked, just as the official
 stands for honosty shall be supported. Theodore Roosevelt was the one who
 made this true in Amorican political life.

Go up to Top of Page