Page View
Cartwright, Carol Lohry; Shaffer, Scott; Waller, Randal / City on the Rock River : chapters in Janesville's history
(1998)
1. Prehistoric and historic Native American occupation, pp. 1-42
Page 19
development associated with expanding city and suburban boundaries. Fur Trade Theme This section attempts to integrate the statewide Fur Trade Theme with events that are known to have occurred or may have occurred in the Janesville area. Little data concerning fur trade events occurring around Janesville was encountered within the primary and secondary sources during the supplementation of this theme. Spurred by the region's bountiful supply of fur-bearing animals and the demand for furs by Europe's growing fashion-conscious classes, traders and merchants from France, Spain, Great Britain, Canada, and the United States were lured to the Wisconsin area in search of adventure, furs, and profits. The fur trade depended on the American Indians as skilled hunting and trapping labor. The indigenous groups, however, did not participate merely as a workforce at the mercy of the Euro-Americans. Throughout most of the fur trade era, various American Indian groups played the role of middleman by supplying more distant groups with trade goods. Additionally, by their behavior, certain tribal groups brought the fur trade to a standstill or provided a rebirth of activities in certain areas of North America. Trade goods were often carried to the wilderness areas by individuals, whose success depended on learning and adapting to the Indian way of life. For the tribal groups this was a time of transition, conflict, and rapid adjustment. Although the impact of the fur trade varied from group to group, it was mainly detrimental to their aboriginal way of life. The fur trade era in Wisconsin has been divided into three periods: French influence (1634-1763); British influence (1763-1815); and American influence (1815-1850). The French period in Wisconsin was important as a time of exploration, discovery, and trade. Early traders were sent to the western Great Lakes as early as 1621. The next several decades saw sporadic trading and missionary work in the Wisconsin area. Toward the later part of the seventeenth century, the Fox-Wisconsin and Brule-St. Croix portages opened the Mississippi River to the French. Trading enterprises escalated, and during the next two centuries, those portages remained the main principal water routes for explorers, missionaries, and traders. King William's War saw a decline in the western Great Lakes fur trade as the French concentrated on the St. Lawrence River Valley. The trade resumed in 1693, only to be abandoned by the French again between 1696 and 1701. During this French absence, the Fox tried to retain their middleman status in the fur trade by violently closing traffic on the Fox- Wisconsin waterway. At this time, the Rock River may have carried more trading vessels to the Mississippi. By the late 1730s, the French had succeeded in driving the Fox permanently southward. The European struggle for control of North America continued with King George's War (1744-1748) and the French and Indian War (1756-1763). With the signing of the Treaty of Paris in 1763, control of the Wisconsin area was given to the British. Despite the high level of French activity in Wisconsin during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, their influence was not lasting. After 1763, many of the French traders left the region for St. Louis or New Orleans. Those that remained eventually joined British and later American trading enterprises. The British-influenced period of the fur trade saw three main centers through which pelts and European goods flowed: Detroit, Grand Portage, and Macinac (Gilman 1974:11). British trade policies were quite different from the previous French patterns. Tribal group members were no longer required to take their furs to Macinac and other centralized trade markets and gift giving was severely reduced (Smith 1973:58). The immediate result of these changes was the Pontiac rebellion (1763-1766), in which the numerous (but not all) tribal groups tried to restore control of their own destinies (Smith 1973:57) and quite possibly gain an upper hand in the fur Prehistoric and Historic Native American Occupation 19
This material may be protected by copyright law (Title 17, US Code).| For information on re-use see: http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/Copyright