Page View
Egstad, H. M. (ed.) / The Wisconsin alumni magazine
Volume 32, Number VII (April 1931)
Can students govern themselves?, p. 266
Page 266
The Wisconsin Alumni Magazine April, I93 Can Students Govern + "Yes" Shout Some "No"1 Cry the Th m lv s Majority in Intramural Speech Contest ei se es DID someone say that forensics were a dead issue crash movie palaces in a body. I mean a desire to be a at Wisconsin? If so, he or she erred badly, for citizen of the university, a desire to make the university during the past few months over eighty students, a social and political entity, a desire to dissipate the both co-eds and "eds" waged verbal combat dormitory and fraternity hermitage in which the average from the rostrums of Bascom Hall giving and asking no student now lives. There is little of that school spirit quarter in the battle of "Can Students Govern Them- present on the campus now. We are content to move selves?" in our own little group circles and let the rest of the insti- The speech department some time ago decided that tution go hang. You can't condemn it, for what can the intercollegiate and intersociety debates afforded one expect when a college ceases to be a college in the the opportunity of debating in public to too few stu- intimate sense, and becomes a great knowledge factory dents. The intramural speech contest was a result. operating for thousands. There is nothing to complain Teams were organized without regard to class or group. about, it's just our situation. Some of the fraternities and sororities entered teams, Back in 1915 the Student Senate was founded and while others were composed of non-fraternity and fra- self-government was given an honest trial. The senate ternity members. The team members did not have to had all of the disciplinary power of the deans. It made speak on the same side of the argument, but were laws governing student conduct, and the affiliated court judged purely on the points made and the method of tried students for misdemeanors. The senate controlled delivery. all fraternity and sorority activities, drafted student The three speeches which follow were chosen from election rules, and controlled the elections themselves. those made by members of the two winning teams. That was perfect self-government, and yet it died in Most of the contestants spoke on the negative side, but 1927, a broken and ignored body. And what killed it? we have chosen to present both viewpoints in order that Not an outraged and abused student body, not a hostile you may judge for yourself the student's attitude on faculty, simply campus indifference. this very disturbing question. This fall we have heard a good deal of agitation in By Jenkin Lloyd Jones, '933 favor of resuscitating the Student Senate. Campus By~enkin Lloydjone,'33 Gabriels are heralding a resurrection. They talk glibly The question which confronts us is: "Can college about school democracy, about the unfairness of faculty students govern themselves?" If I cared to be pedantic supervision. They point out the fact that although the and to approach this subject with germanic thorough- average student lacks experience, he is mentally mature ness, I could, without quibbling, demand definitions for and therefore competent to take care of himself, and four out of the five words in the stated question. What they are- ready to declare their independence from the do we mean by a college? Columbia with her thirty- tyranny of deans. Excellent! Excellent! School eight thousand, or Haverford with 275? C. C. N. Y. democracy is an achievment. Strict faculty super- in the center of a great metropolis, or South Dakota vision leaves much to be desired. The average student stuck far out on the plains? And the students, what is mentally capable of handling himself and of even about them? Harvard men or Wellesley girls, young handling others. Fine, but it won't work here. Frenchmen at the Sorbonne, or rahrah The University of Wisconsin is para- boys at S. M. U.? And if we could doxically too big and too little for such finally discover our "typical college," a system. Like the amoeba, the larger then what do we mean by "govern wegrow, the more we subdivide. There themselves"? are over 9,000 of us, and we are awed By "self-government" we ought to - by our own numbers. So we withdraw mean the complete student control of into a small group, be it a fraternity, a all student affairs, disciplinary or social. sorority, or a dorm section, for our And I propose to dodge all the other companionship. Thirty or forty people perplexities by revising the question to 6 comprise our college world. And we read: "CanWisconsinstudentsgovern think and live in terms of the group, themselves?" This is the only univer- because the college itself is far too large. sity I know anything about. If student indifference killed the Senate I don't think student self-govern- in 1927, it would do the same in 1931, ment is possible at Wisconsin. It has only quicker. We don't want to govern been tried here, and it has failed. And ourselves. its failure is due, I think, to our almost There are only two vestiges left of universal lack of school spirit. That , the student senate. They are the inter- last is a moth-eaten phrase, I know, and _ fraternity council and the Women's I hope you will understand that by i Self-Government Association. The In- school spirit I don't mean simply the terfraternity Council, although it has willingness to attend pep rallies or ON OBSERVATORY HILL (Continued on page 300) Page 266
This material may be protected by copyright law (e.g., Title 17, US Code).| For information on re-use, see http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/Copyright