Page View
Military government weekly information bulletin
Number 87 (April 1947)
General, pp. 14-20
PDF (3.9 MB)
Page 20
the abolished system theretofore in effect. Re-education is a great problem for solu- tion by the enclosure administrators. The Ministry for Political Liberation, acting upon the suggestion of the Denazification Division of this Headquarters, is undertak- ing the solution of that problem. Distinguish- ed supporters of democracy will lecture on topics of current interest, various uni- versity teachers will speak on non-political matters and trade schools are being planned. Representatives of all churches are pro- vided with facilities for holding religious observances in the camp, and no internee, who so desires, has been denied the op- portunity of worshipping or taking part in religious activities. AVhile it is to be expected that a-prison or internment atmosphere does not inspire the best in man, the tendency toward im- morality, petty illegal transactions, and the like, in the Darmstadt enclosure is not ab- normal nor alarming. German criminal po- lice are constantly working in the enclosure to bring such practices to light and to stamp them out. Tribunals are operating daily within the camp, with well over ten percent of the inmates' cases heard to date. This record is not considered unsatisfactlory, when it is realized that the entire tribunal, and trial structure and an investigative staff had to be set up and organized after the turn-over of the first part of the camp to German authorities in October 1946. It is possible that trials would be conducted more rapidly in home communities of the individuals in- volved. Serious security problems, however, dictate caution along these lines. The operation of the Darmstadt enclosure is completely German, subject only to the supervision of Military Government.; This supervision, however, is being constantly ex- ercised in order to insure that the best pos- sible conditions and practices, under the circumstances, prevail. It must be admitted that conditions are far from perfect, but all things considered, it is likewise true that everything possible is being done to insure that justice, without cruelty or unusual punishment, is done to every internee. WHAT GERMAN LEADERS THINK (Continued from Page 13) diate adoption were economic in nature. They dealt with raising the standard of living, bettering working conditions, increasing the food ration, eliminating unemployment, speed- ing up the distribution and production of 'aw materials and finished products, enliven- ing international trade, or settling the cur- rency problems in Germany. The popular impression was that once Ger- many is on a sound economic basis, peace can be considered - from a realistic point of view - to be sure and lasting. However, 33 percent strongly urged increased coopera- tion among the Allies. While this was not stated bluntly, it was contained in such sug- gestions as "lift zonal barriers" "give Ger- many just one peace treaty," "settle the atom bomb problem." Another minority group urged the settlement of certain policy and political problems: "teach democracy to us," "give Germany a central government," and "make the denazification program more just." The largest group of those making sug- gestions on a long-term basis for a lasting peace emphasized the need for inter-Allied cooperation. Twenty-nine percent urged the necessity of such cooperation; many of them broadened the proposal to include "mutual understanding and confidence among the nations of the world." Sixteen percent offered long-range economic proposals and reiterated the desire for better standards of living, in- creased import-export trade, and revitaliza- tion of German industry. Most long-term suggestions, however, dealt with the reconstruction of Germany. The Germans asked, "leave self-administration to the Germans," "Germany should be united again to better her living conditions," "take us back into the family of nations,"' "estab- lish a truly democratic country," or "give us Lebensraum." 20
As a work of the United States government, this material is in the public domain.| For information on re-use see: http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/Copyright