Page View
Kaminski, John P.; Saladino, Gaspare J.; Leffler, Richard; Schoenleber, Charles H.; Carlson, Marybeth (ed.) / Ratification of the Constitution by the states: Virginia (1)
8 (1988)
I. The debate over the Constitution in Virginia, 3 September 1787-31 March 1788, pp. 3-524
Page 24
I. DEBATE OVER CONSTITUTION To GEORGE MASON and DAVID STUART, Esquires, We, the Freeholders of the County of Fairfax, conceiving that the Peace, Security and Prosperity of the State of Virginia and the United States of America in general, do depend on the speedy Adoption of the System of Government recommended by the late General Con- vention of the United States; and that this End will be advanced by an immediate Recommendation from the Legislature of this State, to subject the same to a Convention of Delegates chosen by the Free- holders thereof, for their Assent and Ratification, do therefore direct you, our Representatives, to declare the Opinion of your Constituents, in the next General Assembly of this State, to be for the immediate Convocation of a Convention of Delegates from the several Counties and Boroughs of this State for the said Purpose. The aforesaid Instructions being prepared and signed by all the Freeholders present-it was Resolved, That Charles Broadwater, George Gilpin, Charles Little, John Harper, Lund Washington, James Wren, John Moss, William Payne, Thomas Pollard, Elisha C. Dick, William Thompson, Roger West, William Deneal, Peter Wagener, Daniel M'Carty, George Minor, and Thomas West, Esquires, the Rev. David Griffith, Jeremiah Moore, and William Waters, in the County, and William Hunter, jun. Robert T. Hooe, William Hartshorne, James Keith, William Brown, William Herbert, Charles Simms, David Arell, and John Fitzgerald, Esquires, in the Town of Alexandria, be a Committee to wait on such of the Freeholders in their respective Neighbourhoods, as happened not to be present at this Meeting, with Copies of the aforesaid Instructions, in order that they may sign them.4 1. An undated "Extract of a letter from Georgetown, (Potowmack.)," in the Pennsylvania Gazette, 10 October, reported that the Alexandria and Fairfax meetings would "instruct their Delegates to promote the calling of a Convention" (CC:Vol. 1, p. 585). This extract was reprinted seventeen times by 8 November: N.H. (2), Mass. (3), R.I. (3), Conn. (3), N.J. (2), Pa. (3), Md. (1). 2. Virginia journal, 11 October. In the only known issue of the Virginia Journal, 11 October, this account of the town meeting has been clipped out. The text has been taken from the Pennsylvania Packet, 18 October-the earliest known reprint. This account was again reprinted six times by 5 November: N.H. (1), Mass. (1), Conn. (1), Pa. (3). This item was also reprinted in the October issue of the Philadelphia American Museum and summarized in the New York Daily Advertiser, 19 October. 3. Virginia Journal, 11 October. Reprints by 5 November (6): N.H. (1), Mass. (1), Conn. (1), Pa. (3). This item was also reprinted in the October issue of the Philadelphia American Museum. The New Hampshire and Massachusetts newspapers did not reprint the last paragraph. A summary of the Alexandria and Fairfax County meetings appeared in the Maryland journal on 16 October and was reprinted once in Connecticut, New York, and Georgia by 8 November. 4. Even before accounts of the meetings were reprinted in New York City, New Jersey congressman Lambert Cadwalader reported that "it is said and believed here that the County of Fairfax in Virginia wh Mason represents in the Legislature of that State will 24
Copyright 1988 Wisconsin Historical Society Press.| For information on re-use see: http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/Copyright