Page View
Kaminski, John P.; Saladino, Gaspare J.; Leffler, Richard; Schoenleber, Charles H.; Carlson, Marybeth (ed.) / Ratification of the Constitution by the states: Virginia (1)
8 (1988)
Introduction, pp. xxiii-xxxix
Page xxxi
INTRODUCTION The Mississippi issue had a profound impact on the debates in the Constitutional Convention. Southern delegates realized that, in order to protect their interests, a two-thirds vote in the Senate should be required to ratify treaties. This provision would, in essence, give a united South a veto power over treaties. Some southerners felt that the two-thirds vote requirement should also apply to the passage of all commercial legislation further safeguarding Southern interests. The debate over the Mississippi did not subside when Congress dropped the issue. On 12 November 1787 the House of Delegates passed three resolutions concerning the Mississippi. First, the navi- gation of the western waters by Virginians was a right given to them by God and nature. Second, any attempt by Congress to barter away this right was a violation of the principles of the American Revolution and "strongly repugnant to all confidence in the Federal Government." Third, a committee was to be appointed to instruct the state's delegates to Congress to oppose "the cession of the western navigation." The committee that was appointed does not appear to have reported, and as late as 24 September 1788 congressional delegate James Madison asked Governor Edmund Randolph why the resolutions had not been forwarded to the state's delegates. Unaware of these resolutions, Ran- dolph sent Madison the resolutions of December 1786. The Efforts to Strengthen the Central Government Even before the Articles of Confederation were finally ratified on 1 March 1781, most Americans realized that Congress needed an in- dependent source of revenue to finance the war. The issuance of paper money and the requisition system had not proven effective means of giving Congress financial independence. Many believed that import duties would be the best way for Congress to raise money, but the Articles of Confederation had not given Congress the power to tax. Consequently, in February 1781 Congress proposed an amendment to the Articles-the Impost of 1781-that would have given it the power to levy a five percent duty ad valorem on imported goods, the revenue of which would go toward the payment of the principal and interest on the war debt (CDR, 140-41). The Impost would remain in effect until the debt was paid. On 14 June 1781 the Virginia legislature ratified the Impost, and, because it believed that "commercial regu- lations" throughout the states should be "uniform and consistent," it also authorized Congress to appoint collectors in Virginia. On 17 De- cember 1781, however, the legislature suspended its ratification until the other states approved the Impost. By the fall of 1782 every state, except Rhode Island, had ratified the Impost. On 7 December 1782 the Virginia legislature repealed its ratification, declaring in the pream- XXX1
Copyright 1988 Wisconsin Historical Society Press.| For information on re-use see: http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/Copyright