Page View
Kaminski, John P.; Schoenleber, Charles H.; Saladino, Gaspare J.; Leffler, Richard; Reid, Jonathan M.; Flamingo, Margaret R.; Lannér-Cusin, Johanna E.; Fields, David P.; Conley, Patrick T.; Moore, Timothy D. (ed.) / Ratification of the Constitution by the states: Rhode Island (3)
26 (2013)
VI. The debate over the Constitution in Rhode Island, 20 January-29 May 1790, pp. 711-897
Page 737
COMMENTARIES, 25 FEBRUARY 1790 giving effect to the several acts therein mentioned, in respect to the State of North-Carolina, and other purposes.'- "And be it further enacted, That the second section of the act, en- titled, 'An act to suspend part of an act, entitled an act to regulate the collection of duties imposed by law, on the tonnage of ships or vessels, and on goods, wares, and merchandizes, imported into the United States, and for other purposes,' passed the sixteenth day of September last,2 shall, with respect to the inhabitants and citizens of the state of Rhode-Island and Providence Plantations, be revived, and also, that the fourth section of the said act shall be revived, and both continue in force until the first day of April next, AND NO LONGER." 1. The extract is clause 6 of the North Carolina Act of 8 February 1790. The act provided for the collection of impost and tonnage duties in North Carolina since it was now in the Union. For legislative action on and the text of the act, see DHFFC, VI, 1532-51. 2. See John Adams to Henry Marchant, 17 September 1789, note 2 (RCS:R.I., 610n). Solon, junior Providence United States Chronicle, 25 February 17901 Under the old Confederation the several States retained the power of regulating trade exclusively, by levying imposts, or otherwise: And altho applied to by Congress, several of them pertinaciously refused to part with that power.2 It is not difficult to see that under the operation of that power, lodged in the several State Legislatures, the trade of this State might and prob- ably would, in a short space of time, have been shackled with restraints, and reduced to embarrassments, similar, and perhaps equal to those under which it labours at present. It must therefore be evident, that, in this particular, the old Confederation was inadequate to our protec- tion. The expedient of vesting Congress with power to raise a revenue from trade would not have remedied that defect. It might have placed us in our present situation, charged with a heavy impost, and shut out from the neighbouring ports, with this difference only, that in that case the duties which now go into our own coffers would have gone into those of Congress. Before the powers of the Sword and Purse could be lodged both together in the general Government, with safety, radical alterations were necessary in the very frame and constitution of that government. This did not escape the examination of those enlightened patriots who met at Phila- delphia in the year 1787. The letter from their President to that of Congress contains the following remarkable passage. "The friends of our country have long seen and desired, that the powers of making war, peace and treaties;-that of levying money, and 737
Copyright 2013 Wisconsin Historical Society Press.| For information on re-use see: http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/Copyright