Page View
Kaminski, John P.; Schoenleber, Charles H.; Saladino, Gaspare J.; Leffler, Richard; Reid, Jonathan M.; Flamingo, Margaret R.; Lannér-Cusin, Johanna E.; Fields, David P.; Conley, Patrick T.; Moore, Timothy D. (ed.) / Ratification of the Constitution by the states: Rhode Island (3)
(2013)
VI. The debate over the Constitution in Rhode Island, 20 January-29 May 1790, pp. 711-897
Page 728
VI. DEBATE OVER CONSTITUTION are, the amendments proposed by Congress, and already ratified by several States, will remedy those defects.2 At this late period of discussion by this State, we have not only to consider of the fitness of the Constitution, but the necessity of our adopting it,-the leading characters in opposition have openly avowed that the latter principle must sooner or later operate.-Deputy-Governor Owen, in the preamble to a Bill he presented, (in order to supersede the appointment of a State Convention, by) referring it again to the people, declares, that "the Constitution recommended by the General Con- vention held in Philadelphia, on the 17th day of September A. D. 1787, has been adopted by twelve of the United States: And that the said twelve States have proceeded to organize a Federal Government conformable to the principles thereof and have put the same into actual operation: And that from the operation thereof the citizens of this State will suffer great and manifold inconveniences and discouragements in their trade and commerce, and otherwise, while they are considered and treated as foreigners, wholly disconnected from all the said States: By reason whereof it has become the interest and policy of this State to take the most prudent measures for acceding to the Union of the said twelve States, formed and organized as aforesaid: And that the accession of the State of North-Carolina to the said Union, and the grievous operation of the Federal Government on the interests of many of the citizens of this State, since the last measures taken by the General Assembly on the subject, have presented the same to our view and consid- eration in a very different attitude from that in which it then appeared,"3-Of this necessity however, the present opposers are the only cause.-There was a time when our voice was called for in the General Convention, to join in forming a Constitution,4 when, from the respectability of the State, we had a full share of influence in the Union, and could thereby have effected what had been conformable to our wishes, provided they were founded on the general good-There was also a time when, if we had considered the Constitution in a State Convention, and should have found it inapplicable to our happiness, our objections, if they comported with reason, would have influenced other States in their decision; but the policy of the leading opposers to it, hath been to procrastinate an investigation of it, while the State hath experienced all the evils consequent to an undecided government.-The adoption of it now is of moment to us-Questions of revenue, which involve the most important events to the interest of this State, are now before Con- gress; should we again delay, we may lose an opportunity of doing es- sential service to the interest of the State. From the proceedings of Congress it appears, that in consequence of an application from this State, agreeably to a Resolve of the last sessions of Assembly, they have continued a further suspension of the 728
Copyright 2013 Wisconsin Historical Society Press.| For information on re-use see: http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/Copyright