Page View
Kaminski, John P.; Schoenleber, Charles H.; Saladino, Gaspare J.; Leffler, Richard; Reid, Jonathan M.; Flamingo, Margaret R.; Lannér-Cusin, Johanna E.; Fields, David P.; Conley, Patrick T.; Moore, Timothy D. (ed.) / Ratification of the Constitution by the states: Rhode Island (3)
(2013)
VI. The debate over the Constitution in Rhode Island, 20 January-29 May 1790, pp. 711-897
Page 726
VI. DEBATE OVER CONSTITUTION public credit?-Will Congress suffer a single refractory State to em- barrass its great, necessary national measures? Have not the United States an undoubted right, on the principles of national justice, to pre- vent, in such way as they shall judge proper, our embarrassing the ex- ecution of their political system?-Hath not Congress a right to insist upon, and even to compel us to pay our quota of the debt contracted by the war;-and although this State should consider itself as foreign, and independent, yet, upon the principles of an incorporate union, to view us as a part of the United States, subject to its general government, and to demand from the State its proportion of the expence accrued, and accruing by the General Government?-Now let me ask what would be the consequence if the Congress should make a demand solely of the payment of our quota of the debt contracted by the late war?-Is this State able to pay it?-And would not the country suffer essential injury by distraints?-Let me further ask, is it just that the other States should sustain the whole expence of establishing and administering the Federal Government,-securing the Western Territory, &c. &c. and that this State, without contributing towards it, should enter the Union, and reap all the benefits of that Government and that territory, whenever it shall please to adopt it?5 Can justice admit such an ungenerous sentiment, and will the wis- dom of the United States, to use a familiar proverb, beat the bush and suffer this State to take the bird?6 What measures the Great Council of the Union may take with us, besides leaving us to the operation of her acts of trade, and to our own destruction it would be presumptuous in me to suggest.-But if any degree of resentment could be supposed to enter into their delibera- tions, might we not expect the most rigorous treatment, would be the consequence of unexampled moderation, ignominiously abused. The hints I have thrown out are intended to awaken the attention of the Delegates to the Convention to the true interests of this State; for the honor and happiness of which I am anxiously solicitous. Sure I am that if they will advert to this, and deliberately weigh the merits of the New Constitution, we shall not experience the calamities which a rejection of it will most certainly bring upon us.-But if on the con- trary this State must fall a sacrifice to inconsideration and invincible prejudice, which may Heaven prevent! they who have endeavored, and shall still endeavor to support it, will have this consolation that they have done their duty, while the stings which will goad the consciences of those who have contributed to her ruin will be sharpened by ever- lasting reproach. 726
Copyright 2013 Wisconsin Historical Society Press.| For information on re-use see: http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/Copyright