Kaminski, John P.; Saladino, Gaspare J.; Moore, Timothy D. (Historian); Lannér-Cusin, Johanna E.; Schoenleber, Charles H.; Reid, Jonathan M.; Flamingo, Margaret R.; Fields, David P. (ed.) / Ratification of the Constitution by the states: Maryland (1)
III. The debate over the Constitution in Maryland, 4 December 1787-29 April 1788, pp. 101-428 ff.
COMMENTARIES, 15 DECEMBER 1787 the great and small States, as such, was in my Opinion very properly adjusted any necessary Guards for personal Liberty is the common In- terest of all the Citizens of America and if it is imagined that a defined power which does not comprehend the Interference with personal Rights needs negative Declarations I presume such may be added by the foederal Legislature with equal Efficacy & more propriety than might have been done by the Convention-Strongly and long im- pressed with an Idea that no Governmt. can make a people happy unless they very generally entertain an Opinion that it is good in Form and well administred I am much disposed to give up a good deal in the form the least essensial part But those who are clamorous seem to me to be really more afraid of being restrained from doing what they ought not to do and being compelled to do what they ought to do than of being obliged to do what there is no moral Obligation on them to do-I believe there is no American of Observation Reflection and Can- dour but will acknowledge Men unhappily need more Government than he imagined-I flatter myself that the plan recommended will be adopted in twelve of the thirteen States without Conditions sine qua non-but let the Event be as it may I shall think myself with America in general greatly indebted to the Convention and possibly we may confess it when it may be too late to avail ourselves of their Moderation & Wisdom-You will pardon me my good Sir the Effusions which I cannot restrain when on this Subject 1. RC, Washington Papers, DLC. Johnson and Washington worked together through the Potowmack Company for the improvement of the navigation of the Potomac River. 2. James Madison had written Thomas Jefferson on this matter on 9 December: "Vir- ginia has set the example of opening the door for amendments, if the Convention there should chuse to propose them. Maryland has copied it" (CC:334, p. 395). The first res- olution for both states contains a similar phrase that calls for a convention of the people to give the Constitution their full investigation and decision. For the Virginia resolutions of 31 October, see RCS:Va., 118, and for the Maryland resolutions, see "Resolutions Call- ing a State Convention," 1 December (RCS:Md., 99-100). In his letter of 9 December Madison also stated: "A more formidable opposition is likely to be made in Maryland than was at first conjectured. Mr. Mercer, it seems, who was a member of the Convention, though his attendance was but for a short time, is become an auxiliary to Chace. Johnson the Carrolls, Govr. [Thomas Sim] Lee, and most of the other characters of weight are on the other side. Mr. T[homas] Stone, died a little before the Govermt. was promulged" (CC:334, p. 396). Stone died on 5 October 1787. Both Lee and Stone had declined to serve in the Constitutional Convention of 1787. Antoine de la Forest to Comte de Montmorin New York, 15 December 1787 (excerpt)' . .. It is not yet known what the Special assemblies of Rhode island, Newyork, North Carolina, Maryland and virginia will decide. 113
Copyright 2015 by the State Historical Society of Wisconsin.| For information on re-use see: http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/Copyright