Page View
Kaminski, John P.; Saladino, Gaspare J.; Moore, Timothy D. (Historian); Lannér-Cusin, Johanna E.; Schoenleber, Charles H.; Reid, Jonathan M.; Flamingo, Margaret R.; Fields, David P. (ed.) / Ratification of the Constitution by the states: Maryland (1)
11 (2015)
II. The Maryland General Assembly calls a state convention, 23 November-1 December 1787, pp. 68-100
Page 85
LEGISLATURE, 29 NOVEMBER 1787 Convention. Hence unproductive States cannot draw a revenue from productive States into the Public Treasury, nor unproductive States be hampered in their Manufactures to the emolument of others. When the Public Money is lodged in its Treasury there can be no regulation more consistant with the Spirit of Economy and free Government that it shall only be drawn forth under appropriations by Law and this part of the proposed Constitution could meet with no opposition as the People who give their Money ought to know in what manner it is ex- pended. That no Titles of Nobility shall be granted by the United States will preserve it is hoped, the present Union from the Evils of Aristocracy. S: 10. It was contended by many that the States ought to be permitted to Emit Bills of Credit where their local Circumstances might require it without prejudice to the obligations arising from private Contracts; but this was overruled by a vast Majority as the best security that could be given for the Public faith at home and the extension of Commerce with Foreigners. Article the 2nd. S: 1st. The Election of the President according to the Report of the Committee of Detail was intended to have been by ballot of both Houses; to hold his appointment for Seven Years, and not be Capable to be reelected; but this mode gave an undue influance to the large States, and paved the way to faction and Corruption-all are guarded against by the present method, as the most exalted Characters can only be Known throughout the whole Union-His power when elected is check'd by the Consent of the Senate to the appointment of Officers, and without endangering Liberty by the junction of the Executive and Legislative in this instance. Article the 3rd. S: 1st. The judicial power of the United States underwent a full in- vestigation-it is impossible for me to Detail the observations that were delivered on that subject-The right of tryal by Jury was left open and undefined from the difficulty attending any limitation to so valuable a priviledge, and from the persuasion that Congress might hereafter make provision more suitable to each respective State-To suppose that mode of Tryal intended to be abolished would be to suppose the Represen- tatives in Convention to act contrary to the Will of their Constituents, and Contrary to their own Interest.- Thus Mr. Speaker I have endeavour'd to give this Honorable House the best information in my power on this important Subject-Many parts of this proposed Constitution were warmly opposed, other parts it was found impossible to reconcile to the Clashing Interest of different 85
Copyright 2015 by the State Historical Society of Wisconsin.| For information on re-use see: http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/Copyright