Page View
Hazard, H. W. (ed.) / Volume IV: The art and architecture of the Crusader states
(1977)
VII: Painting and sculpture in the Latin kingdom of Jerusalem, 1099-1291, pp. 251-280
PDF (16.3 MB)
Page 273
Ch. VII PAINTING AND SCULPTURE 273 their convent church was going on in the 1170's. In addition, just outside the main entrance to the Uaram from Temple Street the cru sader church of St. Gilles was erected. After the return of the Haram to Islam in 1187 some of these Christian buildings were dismantled. As a result today one finds ex tensive fragments of crusader sculpture in the Uaram. In particular there are concentrations in the Aqsâ mosque (pls. Villa and b), in the Dome of the Rock, and in the entry area of the Bãb as-Silsilah (pl. lXb), along with scattered fragments elsewhere as in the minbar (pulpit) of Burhãn-ad-Din (pl. Xd) and in the Bãb Hittah (pl. Xc). Some pieces have also made their way to various museums (pl. VIIb), and two extraordinary works were found in Latrun and later taken to Istanbul (pl. Xla). Unlike the sculpture from the Holy SepulcherHospital complex ateliers, much of this sculpture with its beautiful "wet-leaf" foliage is quite unified in style. Yet despite its obvious high quality it has not been possible to trace any clear development in its form; nor can we be sure to which buildings it belonged or even when it was done. The sculpture in the Bãb as-Silsilah, including the portion of the rose window in the Sabil of Suleiman(drinking fountain; pl. IXb), does not belong to the main corpus of the "wet-leaf" sculpture (with two frag mentary exceptions). Fabre's old suggestion that these carvings may have belonged to the church of St. Gilles still seems the best.32 In deed, foundations for a cruciform crusader building have now been found nearby, north of Wilson's arch. And the rose window in the Sabil is an early type, with round arches, diminutive columns, and a carved floral design at the center. As for the "wet-leaf" acanthus sculpture, the variety of surviving pieces has so far defied explanation. Strzygowski's proposal that some of the small-scale pieces were used for the sarcophagus of Bald win V is a possibility.33 Clearly most of the extant material was used for larger-scale architecture (pls. Villa, Xd, and XIa) or its decora tion (pis. VIIb, VIIIb, Xc). For these the destroyed Templar build ings or the Augustinian monastery are possible sources. In regard to dating, the lovely sinuous form of the "wet-leaf" 32. Fabre, "La Sculpture provençale en Palestine au XHe siècle," Echos d'Orient, XXI (1922), 50. 33. J. Strzygowski, "Ruins of Tombs of the Latin Kings on the Haram in Jerusalem," Speculum, XI (1936), 499 ff.; see above, p. 91. It should be noted that Elzear Horn sup posed the tomb he drew was that of Baldwin V because it was "so small" (Ichnographiae monumentorum Terrae Sanctae (1 724-1 744), 2nd ed, tr. E. Hoade, SBF: Publications, No. 15 [Jerusalem, 1962], pp. 74-75 and fig. 10). Many of the fragments Strzygowski cites are too large and not appropriate for the "furniture" he refers to.
Copyright 1977 The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System. All rights reserved. Use of this material falling outside the purview of "fair use" requires the permission of the University of Wisconsin Press. To buy the hardcover book, see: http://www/wisc/edu/wisconsinpress/books/1735.htm