Documents on Germany, 1944-1959: background documents on Germany, 1944-1959, and a chronology of political developments affecting Berlin, 1945-1956
First report of the United Nations commission to investigate conditions for free elections in Germany, April 30, 1952 [extract], pp. 89-98 PDF (4.6 MB)
92 DOCUMENTS ON. GERMANY, 19 4 4-5 9 its visit to Germany due to his indisposition, and the Government of Pakistan appointed Mr. Omar Hayat Malik, its Ambassador to the Federal Republic of Germany, to take his Place pending Mr. Abbasi's return to the Commission. The Commission would like to place on record its appreciation of the services rendered by Mr. Malik, who was called at very short notice to assist it. 38. On 17 March, the Commission met with the Allied High Com- mission and submitted to it the memorandum already referred to. In submitting it, the Chairman stated that the memorandum was coVehed in broad and general terms, as it was the Commission's view that at the present stage it might not be necessary to dwell on numer- ous details. If agreement on the terms of the memorandum could be reached, then it would be the Commission's view that, within the broad scope of that agreement, any detailed arrangements subsequently deemed necessary could be made with the authorities concerned. He added that he and his colleagues felt that the assurances they were seeking from the responsible authorities in Germany were of very great and fundamental importance for the fulfilment of the task en- trusted to the Commission by the United Nations. The Commission could hope to fulfil its mission faithfully and successfully only if the German people, as a result of the assurances and guarantees it was requesting, felt assured that they could co-operate with the Commis- sion without fear and in perfect freedom. It had come to the con- clusion, therefore, that it would be necessary to conclude a written agreement regarding the subject matter of the memorandum with all the responsible authorities in Germany. The Commission hoped to be able to make uniform arrangements with and secure uniform assur- ances from all those authorities. It considered it essential that in all parts of Germany all the people should have the same safeguards and that the United Nations Commission should receive in all parts of Germany identic facilities. The Chairman stated, in conclusion, that he and his colleagues would also like to discuss with the Allied High Commission the question whether it would not be necessary, in view of the fact that the Governments the Allied High Commission represented exercised supreme responsibility in Germany, for the two Commissions to conclude an agreement, at least in regard to those issues raised in the memorandum which possibly fell within the scope of the powers that were reserved to itself by the Allied High Com- mission. - The Allied High Commission might also want to convey to the United Nations Commission formally that it would be prepared to grant it the facilities and assurances it required. 39. Mr. Francois-Poncet, Chairman of the Council of the Allied High Commission, in his reply on behalf of his colleagues, stated that there was nothing in the memorandum that called for a reservation or a negative reply on the part of the Allied High Commission and that he could forthwith give the Commission the formal assurance that the Allied High Commission would assist it in every way possible. In so far as it was possible within the limits of its competence, the Allied High Commission would grant the United Nations Commis- sion the guarantees and facilities it had specified in its memorandum. The Allied High Commission sent a formal reply on these lines the same day. At a meeting held on 19 March, the Commission took note of the reply, expressing its satisfaction therewith.
This material may be protected by copyright law (e.g., Title 17, US Code).| For information on re-use see: http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/Copyright