Page View
United States. Office of Indian Affairs / Annual report of the Commissioner of Indian Affairs, for the year 1874
([1874])
[Dakota], pp. 238-259
PDF (10.7 MB)
Page 247
REPORT OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INDIAN AFFAIRS. 247 the agency to use the bark for feed. If this wasting of timber is not stopped, in a few years this supply will be exhausted. On account of the action of Congress, limiting the amount for pay of employds at any one agency to $6,000 per annum, but little assistance from the agency employes can be given the Indians in farming next season. I have distributed thirty farm-wagons to the Indians. These wagons are very useful to them; the small supply sent by the Government permitted only a limited number of In- dians to get any, while others equally deserving could not be supplied. I would respect- fully recommend that a distribution of at least seventy-five more wagons be made as soon as practicable. The buildings erected at this agency during the past year consist of agent's house, plhysi- cian's house, council-house, three large storehouses, blacksmith-shop, carpenter-shop, em- ployc's' quarters; also stable and corrals. There have been built six houses for Indians, now occupied by them, and much liked. The tents of the Indians affording but little pro- tection against the severe cold of the winter at the reservation, they are compelled to leave the open country and remove to the woods for shelter. I respectfully recommend that assist- ance in men and material be given them to build houses to live in, and to have some rude furniture. As to the treatment of Indians, the most prominent and necessary feature to be observed in dealing and intercourse with them, especially when under the relations between Govern- ment agents to them, is, that never should any promise be made or held out to them unless under a certainty that the promise can be fulfilled in every respect and at the promised time. Wherever the Indians are dependent upon Government for subsistence, there should always be a supply on hand for issue on the days promised them. Annuity goods should be dis- tributed on the day promised by treaty. Nothing causes so much dissatisfaction among Indians as delay or neglect in keeping promises made them; they become at once distrust- ful, and think they are going to be wronged. It is not easy to make them understand any- thing about time and necessity of making appropriations for the purchase of supplies for them, or delays in transporting the same to their destination. On the 14th of January several of the most influential chiefs and head-men of this agency left here for Fort Abraham Lincoln, for the purpose of making, if possible, peace with their old enemies, the Reeiw, who had invited them to come. After remaining at the fort for three days, waiting for the Rees, who did not come, they returned, but were still willing to make peace. After the return of the Indians from Fort Abraham Lincoln. a war-party of Two Kettle's band of Sioux, from the lower agencies, passed this place on their way to attack the Rees. In- formation of this movement was immediately sent to the military at Fort Abraham Lincoln with a view of stopping the war-party, but on the 15th of February the party returned, after having been successful in carrying off eight horses from the Rees. On the 22d of February a party of three Minneconjoux, from Tongue River, killed a sol- dier, who was herding cattle a short distance from the military station at Grand River, and ran off with his horse. One of the same party also stole three of the best horses from the Indians of this reservation. On the night of the 15th of May a party of Gros Ventres made a raid on this place, and stole thirty-three Indian ponies, and succeeded in getting them as far as Mr. Gayton's wood- yard, some twenty-five miles from here, when Mr. Gayton, with his employes, drove off the In- dians and recaptured thirty of the horses. The Gros Ventres managed to get away with three horses. A raiding-party of Sioux from the lower agencies passed here in the latter part of May, on their way north, and returned on the ISth of June, saying that they had killed seven Rees, with a loss to themselves of two killed and one wounded. They profess not to have any ill-feeling against the whites, and say they are always careful when raiding not to im- peril the lives of any whites or injure their property. As long, however, as the Rees com- mit depredations on them, they say they are compelled to retaliate Near Fort Rice, Dakota, on the 2d of July, Joseph Putney, a white man, was killed by an Indian of this agency. It appears that on the evening of the 1st of July Joseph Putney and the Indian had a drunken row, in which he beat the [ndian ; that they took strong drink the next morning, when the Indian, still smarting under the ill-treatment of the previous evening, was again struck by Putney and knocked off his horse. The Indian then shot Putney. This Indian is a brother of Two Bears, a chief of great influence, and is a friendly and well-disposed Indian, but was at the time under the influence of liquor, furnished him by Putney in violation of law. On the 9th of August a deputy United States maishal arrived at the agency, for the purpose of arresting the supposed murderer and take him to Bismarck, Dakota, for trial. I summoned the chief, Two Bears, and told him what the marshal had come for, and that lie was expected to give up his brother for trial. In answer he said that he was present at the time the shooting took place, and that his brother had been made drunk by Putney and beaten, and was in danger of his life when he fired at Putney; that lia brother was not to blame; that the parties who supplied the Indians with liquor should be punished first. In council afterward they asked me to make a statement of the case, and send it to the Indian Bureau, with the request to lay it before the President, and that
As a work of the United States government, this material is in the public domain.| For information on re-use see: http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/Copyright