Page View
United States. Office of Indian Affairs / Annual report of the Commissioner of Indian Affairs, for the year 1856
([1856])
[Northern superintendency], pp. 34-65
PDF (12.8 MB)
Page 56
SIOUX OF THE MISSISSIPPI. thousands, and in some cases the whole fund appropriated ior a special purpose. It cannot be wondered at that the Indians are dissatisfied and con- stantly complaining, making the want of faith on the part of the government officers their excuse for misconduct of every kind, and leading them to be at all times inattentive to the expressed wishes of the agent, superintendent and commissioner of Indian affairs. There are always about the Indians people disposed to give them ill advice, and to take advantage of such circumstances as I have pointed out, to render them more and more disinclined to that course of lifg that has been enjoined them by their Great Father, and towards which they advance rapidly, were it not for the just causes of complaint which I have named, and they often go so far as to accuse the government agent and other employes of the United States government of stealing their moneys. Nay, they have at times asserted the same thing of the President and all the officials under him. Now, no one has had such opportunity of knowing the real state of affairs here as myself, inasmuch as I have been the medium of com- munication between the government agent and the Indians for many years, and I have from time to time seen the letters of the Commis- sioner of Indian Affairs, complaining that more work was not done for the Indians, and shifting all blame from the department on to the shoulders of the agent or the superintendent. This has been very unjust, as far as agent Murphy was concerned, the real blame resting with the department. The evil at this place has arisen principally on the postscript of the lbtter of instructions to the superintendent of Indian affairs, dated April 19, 1854. By this the superintendent was authorized to dribble out the funds to the agent, clearly intimating that the commissioner did not think him fit to be entrusted with the money, as usual. Remember, at this time the superintendent was not under security, whilst Major Murphy, in addition to a bond in a penalty of $50,000, signed by very responsible sureties, was well known to possess property far more than sufficient to meet all his pos- sible liabilities to the government; and now let us see how this new system worked. The expenditures were pressed upon the agent while the funds remained locked up in the hands of the superintendent, and so scantily dealt out by him that the agent was continually laying out his own money, and obliged to withhold vouchers for payment made by him from quarter to quarter, until, by repeated visits to St. Paul and great importunity, he could squeeze out some paltry payment on account from the superintendent. The department is now aware how often Major Murphy has been obliged to retain vouchers for moneys paid by him, because he had not sufficient department funds to cover the amounts. Agent Murphy has been removed, and fault has been found with him for not pushing on the Indian work vigorously, whereas the cause of the delay was the insufficient fund placed at his disposal, and the uncertainty he was always kept in of receiving moneys to meet his liabilities as agent. Laborers were employed, and after working a month or two had to be discharged fbr want of funds to pay their wages and buy provisions, &c. Under the treaty of 1851! one of the
As a work of the United States government, this material is in the public domain.| For information on re-use see: http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/Copyright