Page View
Military government weekly information bulletin
Number 74 (January 1947)
Press and radio comments, pp. 24-43
PDF (10.3 MB)
Page 26
shown lately by the Russians. "The work of the assembly was a fitting retort to those who had dismissed it as a 'mere debating society.' True, it does not have the final word in matters affecting war and peace. But in its debates no punches were pulled. They were honest and earnest. And the resolutions which emerged from them reflect the real temper of those de- ,bates. The Security Council in which so much of the final authority of the United Nations is lodged cannot disregard them Though things look better than they did, prudent people will hold their optimism under strict control, just as they held their pessimism under strict control when inter- national collaboration seemed by way of dis- integrating completely." Washington Post: "The assembly has justified the faith and the hopes of the men who wrote the Charter at San Francisco. It is in fact what it was dubbed by its founders - the town meeting of the world, the place where nations of different size, population, race and historic background meet on common ground to discuss issues of concern to them all. The small powers, in particular, have taken seriously and seiz- ed upon with avidity the freedom of ex- pression which this forum has made avail- able. The assembly just ended was re- markably free speaking. It also was un- biased ... "Taken all in all, adding up its successes and its failures, its strength and its inade- quacies, the General Assembly has justified itself before the world. It presented an old force - the force of world opinion -man- ifesting itself in a new setting. It is alive, dynamic, pregnant, with great possibilities ... experience of this assembly proves in abundant measure that the United Nations is a going concern. New York Herald Tribune: "When the Assembly opened only a very optimistic prophet could have taken a hopeful view of the international situation or of the prob- able contributions which the assembly could make to it. As the session now closes only a pessimist can deny that the whole scene is immeasurably brighter than it was in late October; that the prestige of the United Na- tions is at the highest point it has yet reach- ed, and that even if nothing has been finally settled the bases for workable settlements are nearer and clearer than they have ever been. "The Assembly has shown itself, in the first place, a true sounding board of world opinion and not merely a house packed, by voting majorities, for some one view or another . . . The assembly in short has been doing the work for which it was mainly designed. It has acted as a useful forum of opinion and of minority interests; it has exposed the basic forces out of which any world order must be made; it has arrived at resolutions which in general reflect the presently possible rather than the disas- trously extreme. It has not made peace or a new world. But is has helped toward those ends." World Troop Survey Commenting on the proposed world-wide troop survey the Philadelphia Inquirer said in a recent editorial: "There are worthwhile possibilities in an honest showdown of ar- mies. It could lead to a reduction of them and perhaps provide a basis for an earlier ap- proach by the Big Five Powers to a dis- cussion of disarmament. The new British position wisely dissociates the troops census from disarmament parleys, which would de- lay the troops survey for a year or more. It does call for inclusion of reports on forces held in active status inside each nation. This is also part of the American Government's proposal. "All nations, and particularly Russia with its large armies, can gain by straightforward treatment of this question. The United States, while holding firmly to a policy of adequate defense for this country, should endeavor to have the issue dealt with on that basis. America and Britain are reasonably close together in their ideas about a troop survey. It is to be hoped Russia will join with them and seek a constructive, not a political or propagandistic, disposition of the question." I26
As a work of the United States government, this material is in the public domain.| For information on re-use see: http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/Copyright