Page View
Military government weekly information bulletin
No. 35 (April 1946)
German reactions, pp. 17-20
PDF (1.7 MB)
Page 19
Fig. 1 - Main Issue In Elections German people to the occupation that the primary function of the elections was the transfer of governmental responsi- bility to the German people, replacing MG appointees with popularly selected representatives and by the selection of future leaders. (Ans. 1). For this large group of respondents. the elections were, more or less, a mechanical means 'of car- rying out the transfer. On the other hand, another large segment of the sampled population implicitly viewed the trans- fer itself as begin at stake. (An.s. 2). For these people, the elections were primarily a means employed by the occupation pow- er to test the German political temper to discover whether the German people were ready for self-government and democracyandtodetermine their political dispositions along party lines. Apart from these two groups, a sizeable number 'of persons had no clear or articulate views -on the matter as shown in Ans. 3 of Fig. 1. REASONS FOR VOTING An effort was made- to determine reasons for participation in the elections, Replies indicated that a minority of people had voted for political or partisan reasons - to get the right people for office, ":to vote for the party of my choice." Just as many people, however, indicated that they took part merely in the hope of bringing about a better future, and the most frequent reasons given for taking part in the elections was that to do so was a moral obligation of citizenship and patriotism. In addition, a number of people wanted "to bring about self-government and democracy in Germany," wanted "to express myopinion again," or voted "because I have always voted" or "because my husband said I should vote." REACTIONS TO RESULTS All persons polled were asked whether any parties had received more votes or less votes than the respondent had ex- pected they would. Results clearly indi- cated that the public, taken as a whole, had overestimated the strength of the .leftist parties and underestimated that of the conservative Christian parties. The weak showing of the Communist Party was the biggest surprise of all, being listed by one out 'of every five persons. About one of every ten persons polled had thought that the Social Democrats would sh'ow more strength. Thus, alto- gether, about a third -of the public was surprised at the weakness of the leftist parties. In contrast, very few people (30/o) had expected the Christian parties to show more strength with the electorate than they actually did. Rather, as Fig. 2 indi- cates, about one in every five persons had been surprised by the strength of the Christian parties. Apparently the showing made by the fourth major party proto- type, the Democratic party, was not sur- prising; very few people expressed sur- 19 The question "W hat do you think was the principal issue in these elections?" Answer I . ., Transfer of government to German people (replace MG appointees with popular representatives) (30) (select leaders of the future) (10) 40 0% Answer 2 Test of German political temper by occupation power (determine relative strength of parties and political disposition of German people) (16) (discover whether German peo- ple ready for self-government) (16) (test power of Communists) (2) 34%0/ Answer 3 To "improve situation" make con- ditions better 9 Other comments (vague) 8 No opinion/no answer 9 100 %
As a work of the United States government, this material is in the public domain.| For information on re-use see: http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/Copyright