Page View
Reno, Marcus A., 1835-1889, (Marcus Albert) / The official record of a court of inquiry convened at Chicago, Illinois, January 13, 1879, by the President of the United States upon the request of Major Marcus A. Reno, 7th U.S. Cavalry, to investigate his conduct at the Battle of the Little Big Horn, June 25-26, 1876
(1951)
Twenty-fifth day, pp. 530-542
PDF (9.3 MB)
Page 536
Up to this point let us inquire what; had been Mai, Renoes conduct. He had certainly led the charge up to the point where the men were dismounted0 Capt. Moylan testifies that he heard Reno caution the men about overriding, for he would soon give them work enough. It is in evidence that it was by his order that the skirmish line was thrown out, gand Lieut. DeRudio states that not only was Reno on the line, but that he admired his conduct as a brate and skillful officer, Lieut. Wallace gives as his opinion that Reno's con- duct as an officer in the timber with respect to judgment and courage was all that could be expected of' any one0 Capto .Moylan testifies that the skirmish line was deployed by 4aj9 rsenols order. He was there on the line and he occasionally heard his voice. Lieut. DeRudio testifies that he saw Maj.TReno encouraging his men and standing in a position where he ought to be as commanding Officer. In the face of this testimony the opinions of George Herendeen, the Indian scout who saw Renots back but for a moment and from that fact endeavors to draw an opinion unfavorable to his courage, and Dr. Porter, who afterward confessed to being so scared in the timber, and who in point of fact, forgot that he had halted at the edge of the timber with Capt. 'Moylan before he went back to the river with tie column, are hardly entitled to a passing respect. The mere act of leaving the timber was in itself an evidence of courage. A timid man would have remained there, Even Girard testified that with the number of Indians in the bottom he thought it was an excess of bravery to leave the timber, and he stayed behind because he expected the command would return0 Now if there was nothing more in this case than this we would claim that Maj. Rteno was certainly open in no way to censure as an officer and a soldier. But it is claimed that he showed cowardice in the way in which his command started from the timber to go to the hilltop0 It is said that no bugle calls were given and that was an evidence of fear. It will be observed that no officer was left unless, like L)eRudio, he had retired from the skirmish line without orders, or unless like several others, he was unattached, and they were using their discretion in seeking different places and discharging different duties in the timber, Unless Capt. Moylan is virtuallpr incorrect Maj. Rteno came to the edge of the timber and there consulted with him before any movement of the troops was made, and that it was their Joint judgment that a higher point should be sought on the other side of the river at which the force under XWaj. heno could contend on more nearly equal terms with the force that was brought against him. It is in evidence through a number of witnesses that the command was passed down along the line for the ;nen to mount and to make a charge0 It is in evidence by Cant. 4oylan that the column was undoubtedly formed before the men left the timber, and that if they all had been in their places, as it was the expectation of the commander that they should be, they all would have returned in as good order as his company did, MaJ. Reno led the charge to the river, He was justified in thinking that after the company officers had received the word to mount and charge the men in their co:upanies would be properly informed and fully obey him0 He was seeking to cross an unknown river, and over country to which he was a stranger, to find a place where he might ascend the high land on the other side of the river, It is a matter of dispute where his place should be; but Capt. M4oylan says, it was as proper for him to be at the front as at the rear, and in this opinion he is confirmed by that of other officers. To me it seems plain that where a ford is to be selected and a crossing is unknown, it is the duty of the commander to be there to use his discretion and his judgment with regard to the manner in which the troops shall pass from one side of the river to the- other, and rise to the new place th t they shall occupy for defense0 It is a strange thing in this case that those eyes which saw the most demoralization in the column as it moved to the river, were not those of military men, and it is undoubtedly true that the column may not have been in perfect order, but the circumstances forbade it being so, It was not a triumphant march, It was the departure of a command from a place in which destruction was believed to be sure to a spot in which it was hoped the danger would be less great9 If Reno was doing his duty aL the head of
Copyright 1951 by W. A. Graham.| For information on re-use see: http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/Copyright