Page View
Bunk, Brian D., 1968-; Pack, Sasha D.; Scott, Carl-Gustaf (ed.) / Nation and conflict in modern Spain: essays in honor of Stanley G. Payne
(2008)
Introduction, pp. xi-xviii
Page xv
left-vigorously debated the resemblance. On this issue, Payne sided with the Socialist mod- erates, such as Juliain Besteiro, who argued that the Spain of the 1930s had little in common with the Russia of 1917 since the former had not suffered a defeat in a great world war. The Spanish middle and upper classes, the Church, and the military were intact and ready to do battle with revolutionaries. In fact, the "hero" of The Spanish Revolution may be Besteiro (although he misunderstood the brutality of the Nazis and that of the coming Franco re- gime) just as the "hero" of Politics and Military had been Miguel Maura. Payne endorsed Besteiro's doubts about leftist revolutionary violence by correctly affirming that during the civil war "many Spanish Catholics showed greater discipline, determination, and self-sacrifice than did a large number of the secular utopians."26 Another analogy found in The Spanish Revolution-that between the Spanish Revolution of 1936-37 and its Hungarian predecessor of 1918-19-had major implications for Payne's future work. Payne views the Spanish Revolution, like its Hungarian counter- part, as part of the post-World War I revolutionary wave, a judgment which he has recently confirmed in The Spanish Civil War, the Soviet Union, and Communism.27 In other words, the Spanish Civil War was not a pre-figuration of the Second World War and should not be interpreted as a struggle between democracy and fascism. Instead, it must be viewed within the framework of leftist revolution against rightist counter-revolution as had occurred in Central and Eastern Europe after World War I. As in Hungary during 1918-19, in Spain during 1936-39 the Communists became one of the main, if not the most important, driv- ing force behind the revolution. Thus, Communism and the Soviet Union in the Spanish Civil War were hardly "counter-revolutionary" as many leftists, anarchists, and even some scholars maintain. Rather Communists worked to create in the Iberian Peninsula a model of a people's democracy which the USSR would sponsor throughout Central and Eastern Europe after World War II. Communist actions in Spain during the civil war previewed what would occur "in the first phase of the new east European Communist regimes" immediately after 1945.28 Payne followed Burnet Bolloten in arguing that the Spanish Republic during the final years of the civil war foreshadowed the coming Communist domination in ostensibly semipluralistic regimes after the Second World War. For example, the Partit Socialist Unificat de Catalunya "was the first Socialist-Communist partido unico ever formed in Europe."29 Payne refines this analysis in The Spanish Civil War, the Soviet Union, and Communism. Payne's recent judgment that The Spanish Revolution constituted a significant rup- ture with his previous work cannot be fully sustained. Although The Spanish Revolution condemned the Partido Socialista Obrero Espaiol (PSOE) and other revolutionaries who sparked the Asturias Insurrection in 1934 and attributed to them primary responsibility for the breakdown of representative government, he is nearly as harsh on the CEDA. The latter, like the PSOE in 1933, warned that if election results did not guarantee their basic goals, they would not hesitate to violate the constitution. He continued to see Falange activists as likely to engage in "terrorism" as Communist, Socialist, and CNT militants. He was also xv
Copyright 2008 by the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin