Page View
Kaminski, John P.; Saladino, Gaspare J.; Leffler, Richard; Schoenleber, Charles H.; Hogan, Margaret A.; Reid, Jonathan M. (ed.) / Ratification of the Constitution by the states: New York (5)
23 (2009)
V. The New York Convention, 17 June-26 July 1788 (continued), pp. 2169-2340
Page 2187
CONVENTION DEBATES, 16 JULY 1788 heats by this means will be allayed are the Gent. fully impressed that no other Mode can be adopted-preferable to the one before us-we do want to consult our friends- [Gilbert Livingston, Notes, NN] JOHN JAY. mentn a few reasons-Lansg. supposes it would increase heats-some weight-at first sight-this will depend on the temper with which we go home-if-we go with an intention to investigate- it will have a different effect-the southern [counties] Wish an adop- tion unlimited-the North wish conditions-if we go home and carry the proper information from both quarters-and give them a state of the business before us-with the general reasons for and against con- ditional amendments- [Gilbert Livingston, Notes, NN] JOHN BAY. equally impressed with a desire of peace-but thinks it would have a different effect-will the people from the north stop here-they will ask us our opinions-we must tell them-we are not safe-if we go off the Ground we stand on-gent. from the southward will not tell their const[ituent] s that it is their opinion they ought to adopt with conds-we must tell our constit[uents] s our sentiments- News papers-would teem with different sentiments-ferment will continue till the final question is taken-the sooner it is taken the better-we have been in as perilous times as the present & have got safe thro'- [Gilbert Livingston, Notes, NN] JOHN LANSING, JR. still of the same opinion-Jay has stated a process of language betwn us & our const[ituent]s before we can talk so-we must have a change of sentiments ourselves till that is done-we have nothing to ask from our const [ituent] s-we have gone a considerable length to meet the Gent-they have remained on the ground they first took-has determined on the main question on Mature deliberation- [Gilbert Livingston, Notes, NN] JAMES DUANE. with great concern he sees that a Gent. that has great influence takes this questn. in the point of light he does-can the Gent know, it must be conjecture-a meer chance is an object sufficient- to induce us to try-Gent say they have condescended-made ad- vances-to accommodate-to my mind a conditional amendment is a rejection-then where is that spirit of accommodation-Mem [be] rs of congress are to be sworn-they cannot in my op [inio]n admit us with- out committg. perjury-if we go home & try to reconcile it will have 2187
Copyright 2009 Wisconsin Historical Society Press.| For information on re-use see: http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/Copyright