Page View
Kaminski, John P.; Saladino, Gaspare J.; Leffler, Richard; Schoenleber, Charles H.; Hogan, Margaret A.; Reid, Jonathan M. (ed.) / Ratification of the Constitution by the states: New York (5)
23 (2009)
V. The New York Convention, 17 June-26 July 1788 (continued), pp. 2169-2340
Page 2175
PRIVATE COMMENTARIES ON THE CONVENTION, 14 JULY 1788 Next day, Mr. Hamilton brought forward a plan for ratification, nearly similar to that of Virginia,2 only containing more declarations. On this a considerable debate took place, and much of the old ground gone over, and the decision again postponed till the next day. 1. Reprinted in the New York Packet, 18 July; the Impartial Gazetteer, 19 July; and in fourteen newspapers outside New York by 6 August: N.H. (1), Mass. (3), Conn. (3), Pa. (4), Va. (2), S.C. (1). 2. By this time, Hamilton had undoubtedly seen the Virginia Form of Ratification which had appeared in broadsides printed in both New York City and Poughkeepsie on 2 July and in nine New York newspapers between 3 and 8 July. The Virginia Convention's recommendations-consisting of twenty structural amendments and twenty additional amendments contained in a declaration of rights-were also available to Hamilton, hav- ing been reprinted in the Daily Advertiser, 9 July, and the New York Journal, 10 July. On 15 and 22 July these amendments also appeared in the Poughkeepsie Country Journal. (See "The Arrival in New York of the News of Virginia's Ratification of the Constitution," 2 July, above.) Private Commentaries on the Convention, 14 July 1788 David S. Bogart to Samuel Blachley Webb Poughkeepsie, 14 July 17881 The important decisive question would have been put this morning, had not the eloquent Hamilton and Mr. Jay pleaded the postponement (at least till tomorrow), of a question the most serious and interesting ever known to the people of America-But alas, for the ignorance of many of the antifederalists, notwithstanding the most energetic argu- ments and the clearest demonstrations for the adoption of the Consti- tution, urged by the two Gentlemen above mentioned, they are regard- less of the fatal Consequences resulting from a rejection of it; if Congress should receive it as such,-Mr. Hamilton appeared to be much im- pressed with a sense of this important crisis, and while he exerted every faculty to shew them the improbability that their adoption would be accepted, entreated them to be very deliberate & cool, in determining perhaps not only the fate of the present, but of many generations-Mr. Gilbert Livingston seemed to coincide with Mr. Hamilton, and moved likewise for a postponement of the question, although Mr. Lansing and one or two others used every effort but happily in vain, that the question might be brought forward immediately-The debates this Morning were opened by Mr. Smith, who spoke a considerable time, but I think to little purpose-He appears to be willing to rest upon an uncertainty for he cannot be certain that the manner in which they mean to adopt the Constitution will be esteemed as a ratification-He was followed by The honorable Mr. Jay who after a long controversy about a comparison made by himself, silenced his opponent-He was succeeded again by Mr. Har- rison who in elegant language & with becoming modesty pointed out 2175
Copyright 2009 Wisconsin Historical Society Press.| For information on re-use see: http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/Copyright