Page View
Jensen, Merrill; Kaminski, John P.; Saladino, Gaspare J. (ed.) / Ratification of the Constitution by the states: Pennsylvania
(1976)
IV. The aftermath of ratification in Pennsylvania, pp. [641]-645
Page 643
The Antifederalists argued that the new Congress could not be trusted and demanded that a second constitutional convention be called immediately to adopt a bill of rights to protect the people. They argued that the vast powers of Congress under the Constitution would corrupt its members, who would never relinquish such power. In particular, Antifederalists demanded guarantees of trial by jury in civil cases, religious freedom and liberty, and the freedom of the press. Such Antifederalists as "Centinel" (Samuel Bryan) and "Philadel- phiensis" (Benjamin Workman) were particularly insistent upon a bill of rights. They argued that the Constitution was a "conspiracy" against the rights, liberties, and property of the American people be- cause it established an aristocratic government which would almost certainly become a "despotic monarchy." "Philadelphiensis" described the "monarchy men" in the Constitutional Convention as "a set of the basest conspirators that ever disgraced a free country." (The "Centinel" and "Philadelphiensis" essays are published in Commentaries on the Constitution.) The Antifederalists, led by "Centinel" (XVI and XVII, Independent Gazetteer, 26 February and 24 March), declared there were conspira- cies of other kinds. They charged that Robert Morris, William Bingham, and Thomas Mifflin had pocketed millions of dollars of public funds during the War for Independence, and that the ex post facto clause of the Constitution would enable them to avoid paying their just debts (for examples, see Mfm:Pa. 455, 457, 487, 511, 522, 538). Robert Morris replied that it was through no fault of his own that his remaining accounts had never been settred (Mfm:Pa. 613), while Mifflin's supporters declared that he had done everything pos- sible to settle his accounts as quartermaster general of the Continental Army (Mfm:Pa. 493). Charges that Federalists used their influence with postal officials to prevent the circulation of Antifederalist material through the mails were made throughout the United States, but most heatedly in Penn- sylvania. OnI 1 January, Ebenezer Hazard, postmaster general of the United States, with the consent of Congress, transferred the carrying of mail from stagecoaches to postriders. The stagecoaches had carried newspapers from one publisher to another without charge, but the postriders refused to carry newspapers without being paid to do so. Antifederalists led by "Centinel" (IX, Independent Gazetteer, 8 January) charged that Hazard's decision was a plot to prevent the circulation of Antifederalist material, while others declared that Federalists paid postmasters and postriders to destroy Antifederalist material. Federalists denied such charges and insisted that the Anti- federalists were merely trying to stir up trouble. (For documents on 643 INTRODUCTION
Copyright 1976 Wisconsin Historical Society Press.| For information on re-use see: http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/Copyright