Page View
Jensen, Merrill; Kaminski, John P.; Saladino, Gaspare J. (ed.) / Ratification of the Constitution by the states: Pennsylvania
2 (1976)
B. The assembly election, 9 October 1787, pp. 173-179
Page 177
B. ASSEMBLY ELECTION/9 OCT. McKeehan and Moore ran for the fourth Convention seat is unknown. The man elected, John Reynolds, also voted against ratification. 3. Montgomery refers to the 2,000,000 acres which John Cleves Symmes of New Jersey had bought from Congress. Richard Butler to William Irvine, Carlisle, 11-12 October (excerpt)1 The new Constitution for the United States seems now to engross the attention of all ranks. The better or wiser kind of people wish its adoption, but the Whitehill-ites are doing all they can against it, paper against paper, and almost man against man. I suppose never was an election begun under worse auspices or with the appearance of more confusion and difference of opinion. The generality of the people would go right if let alone, and although I cannot say that every part of it pleases me and many others, we think it had better be tried than cobbled or tinkered, but these filthy puppies have (to carry their point) brought it and our d [amne] d [state] constitution together which makes it a kind of sacrilege to say a word in its favor to the very people it would most immediately help, the mechanics. The great commotion of this county [Cumberland] is not yet fully seen or can it till the returns for assemblymen comes in which is hourly expected. If it comes in time you shall have it. I have for- warded the new form to Pittsburgh with several papers and the re- solves of this town meeting, but it is feared that [William] Findley and his copartners in iniquity are gone up fraught with opposition papers. God only knows what will be the event, but I am not out of hope yet. I find by sad experience there is no likelihood of in- terest being paid on the certificates. Whether it is a state trick to sell the lands, the fault of the treasurer, or poverty in reality I don't know, but some are swearing and some laughing about it; but I want the money. I presume you have had hot work in Congress about this new apparition. Some I suppose are frighted and others see it as a guardian angel. I suspect some from the Dominion [Vir- ginia] will be averse to it. The party in this state have gone great lengths; indeed Mr. [Robert] Whitehill almost said to a friend of ours, G [enera] lA g [John Armstrong], that G [enera] l W [ashingto] n was a fool and Mr. F [rankli] n a dotard. He was not quite so plain but bordered close. Thus these gentry go on. the 12th. The returns are not all in, but from every account [Thomas] Kennedy, [Thomas] Beals, [David] Mitchel and [John] Oliver goes. A hopeful set and highly to the honor of Cumberland. 177
Copyright 1976 Wisconsin Historical Society Press.| For information on re-use see: http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/Copyright