Page View
Jensen, Merrill; Kaminski, John P.; Saladino, Gaspare J. (ed.) / Ratification of the Constitution by the states: Pennsylvania
(1976)
B. The assembly election, 9 October 1787, pp. 173-179
Page 173
B. THE ASSEMBLY ELECTION 9 October 1787 Federalists and Antifederalists made the Constitution a major issue in the election. The Federalists, with their leadership virtually in- tact, retained control of the Assembly and the Council, although their majority was somewhat smaller than it had been in the previous Assembly. In addition to gaining some seats in the As- sembly, the Antifederalists reelected most of their leaders, some of whom had been among the seceding members. They returned William Findley and James M'Calmont to the Assembly. Abraham Smith, who was not eligible for reelection to the Assembly, was elected to the Council. Of the eligible seceding members, only Joseph Powell and Samuel Dale were not reelected; while Robert Whitehill, also a seced- ing member, but not eligible for reelection, lost his bid for a Council seat. However, former councillor James McLene's election to the Assembly was an Antifederalist triumph. The turnover was the smallest it had been since the Revolution: seventy percent of the members of the previous Assembly were reelected. Carlisle Meeting, 3 October1 At a meeting of the inhabitants of the borough of Carlisle, in the county of Cumberland, convened at the courthouse, Major General John Armstrong was unanimously chosen chairman.2 The business of the meeting was opened by Colonel [Robert] Magaw,3 and the Constitution of the United States, formed by the late Convention, was read, and the following resolutions unanimously entered into: Resolved, That the said Constitution is most warmly approved of by this meeting, and that this meeting entertain the highest sense of the public virtue and patriotism of the majority of the House of Assembly in calling immediately a convention of this state, in pur- suance of the recommendation of the Federal Convention. Resolved, That it is the opinion of this meeting, that the withdraw- ing or absenting of a member of Assembly, in order to defeat any resolution or act of the legislature, is an offense most destructive to good government and the happiness and true interest of the state. And that any member who is guilty of such desertion and breach of trust is unworthy of the confidence of the people and unfit to represent them.4 173
Copyright 1976 Wisconsin Historical Society Press.| For information on re-use see: http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/Copyright