Page View
Kaminski, John P.; Saladino, Gaspare J.; Moore, Timothy D. (Historian); Lannér-Cusin, Johanna E.; Schoenleber, Charles H.; Reid, Jonathan M.; Flamingo, Margaret R.; Fields, David P. (ed.) / Ratification of the Constitution by the states: Maryland (1)
11 (2015)
I. The debate over the Constitution in Maryland, 17 September-30 November 1787, pp. 3-67
Page 14
I. DEBATE OVER CONSTITUTION bring the Paxton boys upon you?3 The seeds of Confusion were sown sometime ago, and now they begin to spring. Our best regards and wishes attend you and Mrs Penn and I am dear Sir yr affte friend & hble Sert 1. FC, Tilghman Papers, MS 2821, MdHi. Docketed: "Copy." Penn (1729-1795), a grandson of proprietor William Penn, was proprietary lieutenant governor of Pennsyl- vania and the Lower Counties (Delaware), 1763-71, 1773-76. The Revolutionary War ended his tenure in office and for a time the patriot government of Pennsylvania placed him on parole. Since Penn was moderate in his criticism of the patriot government, he eventually was able to keep most of his extensive Pennsylvania land holdings. 2. For the Federalists use of force to obtain a quorum in the Pennsylvania Assembly in order to adopt resolutions calling a state convention to consider the Constitution, see RCS:Pa., 95-126, and CC:125 A-B. 3. The "Paxton Boys" were Scotch-Irish settlers living in western Pennsylvania who had grievances against the proprietary government for failing to protect them from the Indians. In January 1764 about 250 of the "Paxton Boys" marched on Philadelphia to present their grievances. They were met in Germantown by Benjamin Franklin who prom- ised them that the colonial assembly would address their grievances. The "Paxton Boys" then returned home. Caution Maryland Journal, 12 October 17871 To the INHABITANTS of BALTIMORE TOWN. An attempt to surprise you into any public measure, ought to meet your indignation and contempt. When violence or cunning is substi- tuted for argument and reason, suspicion should take the alarm, and prudence should dictate the propriety of deliberation. Questions of consequence in private life, ought not to be hastily decided, and with greater reason, determinations, that involve the future felicity of a whole people, ought not to be taken before the most mature and deliberate consideration, and a free and full examination of the subject, and all its consequences.-These reflections occurred on being informed that some gentlemen of this Town, employ themselves in carrying about and soliciting subscribers to a petition, addressed to the General As- sembly, requesting them to call a Convention to ratify the new system of government, proposed for the United States, by the late Convention at Philadelphia. If this petition contained no more, it would not have been worthy of notice; but it publishes to the world your entire appro- bation of the New Federal Government, and your desire that it should be adopted and confirmed by this State, as it stands, without any amend- ment or alteration. The ostensible cause for offering you the petition to sign is, that you may express your sentiments to the legislature, that 14
Copyright 2015 by the State Historical Society of Wisconsin.| For information on re-use see: http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/Copyright