Wolff, R. L.; Hazard, H. W. (ed.) / Volume II: The later Crusades, 1189-1311
V: The Fourth Crusade, pp. 152-185 PDF (11.7 MB)
Ch.V THE FOURTH CRUSADE 157 contribute a thirtieth of their incomes, but had not yet paid even the fortieth he had commanded.<10> Ralph de Diceto reports that the notary sent from Rome to oversee the levy acted high-handedly, and there was a general suspicion that such funds were apt to stick to the fingers of the Roman gentry.<11> In speaking of the levy, Matthew Paris calls it a questionable exaction (argumentosa extorsio), which future events were to show was displeasing to God.<12> According to Ralph of Coggeshall the Cistercians protested against the pope's attempt to collect the levy as a persecution of the order.<13> There is no way of knowing how much money was collected locally under the terms of this levy, or how much was actually transmitted to Rome. With all this opposition, tacit and expressed, on the part of the clergy, the levy was probably not very successful. Nor do we know what pecuniary results, if any, attended the pope's tentative effort to extend the levy to monarchs and nobles. In June 1201 the papal legate, Octavian, cardinal-bishop of Ostia, who had succeeded cardinal Peter in France, made the proposal to the kings of England and France. Philip Augustus and John met together and agreed to contribute a fortieth of a year's income from their lands and the lands of their vassals, on the condition that they should undertake the collection themselves and decide how the money was to be used. The monarchs then issued writs commanding their vassals to assess themselves in this amount.<14> Of any money which may have been raised in this way, probably not much went to defray the expenses of the crusade. Both Philip and John had other and more pressing uses for any revenue they could collect. As a further recruiting measure in France, on November 5, 1198, Innocent III, presumably acting through Peter Capuano, had commissioned the parish priest, Fulk of Neuilly, to preach the crusade to the people. For some two or three years previously, Fulk 10 This letter, Verendum est, is found only in the Gesta, chap. LXXXIV (FL, CCXIV, cols. 132 ff.). Potthast (no. 1045) dates it April-May 1200, but it must have been written after April 1201, since it contains an unmistakable reference to the pope's confirmation of the treaty between the Venetians and the French envoys. See below, note 29. 11 Opera historica (Rolls Series, LXVIII), II, 168-169. 12 Historia Anglorum (Rolls Series, XLIV), II, 13 Chronicon Anglicanum (Rolls Series, LXVI), p. 130. Eventually, it seems, the pope accepted a compromise with the Cistercians; Potthast (Regesta, no. 1435, July 1201) cites a letter of Innocent thanking abbot Arnold Amalric of Citeaux and the chapter for the offer of 2,000 marks for the crusade. 14 Roger of Hoveden (Chronica, IV, 187 ff.) tells of the meeting of the kings and gives the writ issued by John. The writ of Philip Augustus is found in Delisle, Catalogue des actes de Philippe Auguste, no. 619. See also Delaborde, "A propos d'une rature dans une lettre de Philippe Auguste," Bibliotheque de l'Ecole des chartes, LXIV (1903), 306 ff., and A. Cartel lieri, Philipp II. August, IV, i, 77.
Copyright 1969 The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System. All rights reserved. Use of this material falling outside the purview of "fair use" requires the permission of the University of Wisconsin Press. To buy the paperback book, see: http://www.wisc.edu/wisconsinpress/books/1733.htm