University of Wisconsin Digital Collections
Link to University of Wisconsin Digital Collections
Link to University of Wisconsin Digital Collections
The History Collection

Page View

Zacour, N. P.; Hazard, H. W. (ed.) / Volume VI: The impact of the Crusades on Europe
(1989)

VII: The Ottoman Turks and the Crusades, 1329-1451,   pp. 222-275 PDF (18.9 MB)


Page 272

272 A HISTORY OF THE CRUSADES 
the Ottomans both promised not to cross the Danube to attack. The Serbian
despot was to remain under the sultan's suzerainty as a tributary prince.
Viad Dracul was included in the peace treaty as an Ottoman tributary prince
but under Hungarian protection. The sultan solemnly ratified the treaty by
oath in the presence of the ambassadors. In order to take the oaths from
the king, the despot, and Hunyadi and to implement the surrender of the fortresses
in Serbia to the despot, the sultan sent Balta-oghlu Suleiman'5° to Hungary.
By the peace treaty Hungary had attained the objectives it had pursued for
decades. Beyond this, any continuation of war would have to be a real crusade
to eliminate Ottoman rule in the Balkans and rescue Constantinople. 
 Already, however, on April 15, 1444, the king had given his oath in the
presence of cardinal-legate Cesarini to continue the crusade that summer.'5'
But there was strong opposition in Hungary to the continuation of the war.
In April the Hungarian diet did not approve the preparations for war. Those
in favor of peace gave priority to improvement of internal conditions in
Hungary and Poland, while the war party believed in the potential success
of a crusade and its advantages for the king's position in Hungary. The pope's
legate Cesarini and John de' Reguardati, the Venetian envoy in Buda, vigorously
supported the partisans of war. Already, in the winter, the Venetian senate
had formally notified the king of its resolution to join the crusade and
send a fleet to the Straits to cut off Ottoman communications between Asia
and Europe; this fleet left Venice on June 15, 1444. At this point Venice
expected the imminent collapse of the Ottoman empire, and planned to occupy
Gallipoli, Thessalonica, Albania, and even some ports on the Black Sea. The
news of the departure of the fleet reached Hungary in July and definitely
had a strong influence on the decision to go to war. In his letter dated
July 30, 1444, John VIII Palaeologus told the king that it was the most opportune
moment to destroy the Ottomans, since Murad II had crossed over to Anatolia,
and that the peace treaty had thus served its real purpose. 
 Despot Constantine in the Morea promised his military coöperation with
the crusaders, and had already taken the offensive. Byzantine diplomacy also
appears to have been responsible for the coöperation of the Karamanids
with the despot and Hungary.'52 Within the Balkans Scanderbeg and Ghin Zenevisi
in Albania, as well as the Albanians and Vlachs in Thessaly, were in rebellion,
and king Tvrtko II 
150. Later, in 1453, the Ottoman admiral at the siege of Constantinople.
151. See above, note 142. 
152. Inalcik, Fâtih devri, p. 33. 


Go up to Top of Page