Hazard, H. W. (ed.) / The art and architecture of the crusader states
IV: Military Architecture in the Crusader States in Palestine and Syria, pp. 140-164 PDF (8.9 MB)
Ch. IV MILITARY ARCHITECTURE 161 century had as fine walls as any, extended to include the outer suburbs at the time of Louis IX's visit. Caesarea, Jaffa, fortified by Frederick II but again ruined, and Sidon were all repaired by the pious king Louis, who worked with his own hands at the task of building. In 1227 some crusaders, waiting for the dilatory Hohenstaufen emperor, had occupied themselves in building the small sea castle on an isolated rock in the port of Sidon; now on the land side Louis built a citadel in the winter of 1 253-1 254, the foundations of which, in the old Phoenician acropolis, can still partially be traced under later Turkish rebuilding. Tiberias still had in 1837 a complete circuit of walls with round projecting towers, which may well have included crusading work, but in the great earthquake of that year they were completely destroyed.31 At Beirut under John I of Ibelin the walls and castle were splendidly maintained. Wilbrand of Oldenburg (1211) gives us a rare glimpse of the interior of a seigneurial establishment. The great hall opened on the sea; its mosaic pavement simulated waves; the vaulted ceiling was painted with the signs of the zodiac; a fountain in the middle, figured with dragons and other beasts, cast a jet of water upwards, whose sound "soothed to sleep those who came to repose themselves."32 Most notable of all were the walls and citadel of Jerusalem. To the Franks the Herodian tower of Phasael with its great courses of masonry was the Tower of David, and here the kings eventually fixed their palace, building an irregular courtyard defended by rectangular towers. The Tower of Phasael itself, so familiar a landmark on medieval maps of Jerusalem and on the seals and coins of the Latin kings, was dismantled by an-Nãsir Dã'üd of Kerak in 1239. "The stones were so large that all wondered at them."33 With the exception of Saone and Margat nothing has been said as yet of the fortresses of the principality of Antioch.34 The city itself 31. A. and L. de Laborde, Voyage de la Syrie (Paris, 1837), pis. LXI, LXII. 32. Laurent, Peregrinatores, pp. 166-167. See also, for Beirut, Du Mesnil du Buisson, "Les Anciennes defenses de Beyrouth," Syria, II (1921), 235-257, 3 17-327, and lithographs in de Laborde, op. cit., pis. XXVII, XX VIII. 33. Continuation of William of Tyre, RHC, 0cc., II, 529. See C. N. Johns, "Excavations at the Citadel, Jerusalem: Interim Report, 1935," Quarterly of the Department of Antiquities in Palestine, V (1935), 127-131; "The Citadel, Jerusalem: A Summary of Work since 1934," ibid., XIV (1950), 121-190; and Guide to the Citadel of Jerusalem (Jerusalem, 1944). 34. For the Antiochene castles see C. Cahen, La Syrie du nord a l'époque des croisades et la principauté franque d'Antioche (Institut français de Damas, Bibliothèque orientale, vol. I; Paris, 1940), pp. 109-176. See also Deschamps, La Defense du Comté de Tripoli et de la Principauté d'Antioche (in press) [J. F.].
Copyright 1977 The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System. All rights reserved. Use of this material falling outside the purview of "fair use" requires the permission of the University of Wisconsin Press. To buy the hardcover book, see: http://www/wisc/edu/wisconsinpress/books/1735.htm