Page View
Documents on Germany, 1944-1959: background documents on Germany, 1944-1959, and a chronology of political developments affecting Berlin, 1945-1956
(1959)
Statement at Geneva by Secretary of State Dulles, on Germany and European security, October 28, 1955, pp. 166-169
PDF (1.8 MB)
Page 168
DOCUMENTS ON GERMANY, 1944-59 peace; in other words, that the reunification of Germany is one of the problems, a settlement of which will serve to consolidate peace. We have come here with proposals to deal with each of these two problems, the solution of which would serve the interests of consolidat- ing peace. We have put on the table yesterday, through President Pinay, the proposal for the unification of Germany, which reflects in essence the Eden Plan which was put forward at our Berlin Confer- ence, and the new proposals to give security assurance in connection with the reunification of Germany. The Eden Plan is, as I say, one with which we are all familiar; and it is reintroduced now, substantially in its initial form, because it is based upon principles which are basic and sound and which reflect the directive that we, should seek a "settlement of the German ques- tion and the reunification of Germany by means of free elections carried out in conformity with the national interests of the German people." The suggested treaty of assurance on the reunification of Germany Yes new and it represents an honest, sincere, painstaking effort to carry out the directive in that respect and to meet what we recognize to be the legitimate preoccupations of the Soviet Union and, indeed, of all of us, as against the possibility that Germany might again become a militaristic state. The proposals include all of the features which we were instructed to consider; provisions for an obligation not to resort to force, that is one; provision to deny assistance to an aggres- sor, that is another; limitation, control and inspection in regard to armed forces and armaments, that is another; the establishment be- tween East and West of a zone in which the disposition of forces will be subject to mutual agreement. All of those aspects which we were instructed to consider are realistically incorporated in the out- line of a treaty which has been submitted by the three Western Powers. And in addition to the features which we were instructed to con- sider the proposal contains under the paragraph numbered 8 a sug- gested agreement to react against aggression which involves under- takings of the utmost gravity and which for the United States would constitute an extremely serious and far-reaching commitment having regard to our traditional attitude toward these matters and to our geographical separation from the European continent. It is, how- ever, something that I believe the United States would be prepared to do as a part of a contribution to bring about the increased security for all which would come with the reunification of Germany. I was very glad to hear Mr. Molotov say that he would study these proposals more carefully, because it is quite obvious that his initial reaction is based upon an inadequate understanding of the document. As I understood Mr. Molotov, his basic objections to the proposal, as he, understood the proposal, were in essence two: One to the effect that the proposal required Germany to become a party to NATO and the other was that the sanctions of the treaty were mere "consulta- tions." Dealing with the first point, let me say that there is nothing what- soever in the treaty proposal which conflicts with the provision of the Eden Plan that the all-German Government shall have, authority to assume or reject the international rights and obligations of the Fed- eral Republic and the Soviet Zone of Germany. Let me make it per- fectly clear and emphatic: There is nothing whatsoever in the treaty
This material may be protected by copyright law (e.g., Title 17, US Code).| For information on re-use see: http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/Copyright