Page View
United States. Office of Indian Affairs / Annual report of the Commissioner of Indian Affairs, for the year 1883
([1883])
Reports of agents in Indian territory, pp. 60-90
PDF (14.9 MB)
Page 89
REPORTS OF AGENTS IN INDIAN TERRITORY. 89 with the assistance of the entire Army, could not comply with the treaties made with these people "to remove and keep out intruders." These reservations differ from those of the wild tribes in this respect. There, all white men on the reservation are there by permission of the agent. At this agency, 2,000 whites are here by permission of the treaty, and 16,000 who labor for the Indians, and have permits issued by Indian author- ities, besides a constant stream of emigrants through the reservation in all directions. The Indians are to blame for most of the intruders being here. They employ white men without obtaining a permit from their own authorities, as the treaty and their own laws require. The white man thus employed without a permit is an intruder and liable to be so reported at any time. The last Congress having failed to provide a penalty for the return to the reservation of those intruders who have been removed, the removal of intruders still remains a farce. CITIZENSHIP. The question that has been so long before the Department as to whether the Indian Nations or the Department shall determine who are entitled to citizenship in these nations is in a fair way to settlement. Inspector Ward and Special Agent Beede, hav- ing investigated the matter for several weeks here, bave made their report to the honorable Secretary of the Interior. A decision cannot be made too soon, as the un- settled condition of this matter is a source of annoyance to the nations and claim- ants. Since this appointment of the Commission I have declined to investigate claims to citizenship and grant protection papers to those who present a prima facie case, as has been the regulation heretofore; and the authorities do not disturb claimants--all waiting for the Department to determine what shall be done and who shall do it. PER CAPITA PAYMENT. In 1832, when the Creeks were removed from Alabama, there were 573 orphan chil- dren, and the United States set aside twenty sections of the lands taken from the Creeks to be sold for their benefit as the President may direct. The lands were sold and the money placed in the United States Treasury. After fifty years the sum re- ceived for the lands, with interest, amounting to $315,995.06 was forwarded to me to be paid to the orphans or their legal heirs. All except twenty-five of those who were orphans in 1832 are dead. The money was paid to the orphans who were present, and to the legal heirs of those who had died. At this payment, though thousands had gathered to witness it, the best of order prevailed. The police were successful in capturing a large amount of whisky intended for that market. This no doubt con- tributed largely to keep things quiet. The claimants, in nearly every instance, after paying their debts, took their money home with them. If the principal could be paid during the year to the Delawares, to whom I pay annually about $50,000, it would be better for them and for the service. LEASED LANDS. The Cherokees have collected tax frown cattle-men for grazing on lands known as the " ICherokee strip," lying in the northwest corner of the Indian Territory, for sev- eral years. Last year the sum received was over $40,000, and collected by the Chero- kee authorities. In June last, at the extra session, the Cherokee council leased the above-mentioned lands to a cattle company for a term of five years, at an annual rental of $109,000. The company is entirely responsible, and, as they pay the rent six months in advance, the action of the council was certainly wise. The unoccupied lands ceded by the Creeks to the United States are covered with cattle, on which tax is paid to no one. The owners of these cattle, and those who refuse to pay taxes to the Indian authorities, are violently opposed to leasing Indian lands for grazing purposes, because, when the lands are leased, those occupying them are compelled to pay for grazing or get out. There is no sense in permitting hundreds of thousands of dollars to burn up every year, or go into the pockets of a few cattle- owners, who will not pay a farthing for the feed, when it could be let to the highest bidder and a large revenue realized. FREEDMEN. Under the treaty of 1866 provision was made for the Choctaw freedmen becoming citizens of that nation, or for their removal. No action has been taken since the making of the treaty, and the Freedmen have remained citizens of the United States and residing and making improvements in the Choctaw Nation. They are not sub- ject to the jurisdiction of the Indian courts, and dissatisfaction and complications have arisen until the extra session of the Choctaw council was called in June, and the Freedmen adopted on certain conditions, which, if accepted by them and approved by Congress, will settle the matter forever.
As a work of the United States government, this material is in the public domain.| For information on re-use see: http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/Copyright