University of Wisconsin Digital Collections
Link to University of Wisconsin Digital Collections
Link to University of Wisconsin Digital Collections
The History Collection

Page View

Military government weekly information bulletin
Number 98 (June 1947)

Political parties,   p. 11 PDF (698.8 KB)

Page 11

THROUGHOUT Germany the va-
riout authorized political parties
are slowly approaching national ex-
istence if not national legal status.
The Social-Democrats, organized cen-
trally with headquarters at Hanover
under the chairmanship of Dr.Kurt
Schumacher, have virtually returned
to their pre-1933 organization. Only
in the Soviet Zone of Occupation is
the party not authorized.
The Communists have always been
strongly organized centrally-and their
party machinery has now extended
itself into the international field, send-
ing a special group of fraternal dele-
gates to the 19th National Congress
of the Communist Party of Great Bri-
tain held in London in late February.
Throughout the US Zone there has
been much discussion of possible
amalgamation of the KPD with the
Socialist Unity Party (SED) establi-
shed in Berlin and the Soviet Zone in
April 1946.
The various Christian Democratic
parties (CDU in the British and So-
viet Zones, the larger part of the
French Zone, and in Hesse and
Wuerttemberg-Baden; CSU in Bava-
ria, and the Baden Christian Social
People's party in South Baden (BCSV)
climaxed a series of conferences and
joint committee meetings with a ga-
thering in mid-March in Berlin. It
should be emphasized, however, that
the CDU-CSU-BCSV committee is a
neo-federalist conference and in no
sense of the word a national party.
Each Land or Zone organization re-
tains complete freedom of action and
the gatherings are meetings of party
leaders rather than the assembling of
delegates elected from various geo-
graphical sub-units of a single natio-
nal party.
SOMEWHAT more confusing is the
picture of that group of parties
labeled variously as "Liberal Democ-
ratic," "Free Democratic," and "De-
mocratic Peoples." In the past year
conferences have been held at Bad
Pyrmont, Coburg, and Rothenburg,
but none of these can be said to have
been really representative. These par-
ties are not well organized and con-
23 JUNE 1947
ferences are likely to be held without
representation of several Laender (or
even a whole zone); nonetheless, the
Rothenburg gathering in March took
steps to set up a new organization to
be called the German Democratic par-
ty as a sort of over-all holding com-
pany with independent share-holders.
As with the CDU groups, a party of
neo-federalist units is envisaged, each
zonal organization remaining a free
agent; however, the democrats did go
so far as to name two co-leaders for
Germany: Dr. Theodore Heuss (US-
Zone) and Dr. Wilhelm Kuelz (Soviet
While the left parties - SPD and
KPD - have already attained orga-
nic unity in Germany, several diffi-
culties have beset the unifiers of the
non-Marxist parties, difficulties which
have led in both parties to confeder-
ation as a solution of their problems.
These difficulties have been both pro-
grammatic and organizational. In the
first category, the parties associated
with the CDU have a considerable
problem in synthesizing their right
and left wings on socio-economic pol-
icy and their federalist and centralist
wings on policies of German govern-
mental structure. While the Democ-
ratic parties are much more centralist-
minded and are troubled less by the
issue than the Christian Democrats,
the question of socio-economic policy
is just as real to them. Even within
the US Zone, the DVP of Wuerttem-
berg-Baden maintains it is the "golden
mean" between CDU reaction and
SPD-KPD Marxism while the LPD in
Hesse holds forth as the last-ditch
defender of free enterprise against
attacks from SPD and CDU alike.
These problems of policy in the
two non-Marxist parties are further
complicated by  the organizational
difficulties inherent in the coming
together of independent zone political
groups. In each zone - even in each
Land - various local political leaders
have claims to recognition, claims
which the left is sometimes able to
sublimate in a crusade for socialism,
but claims which become of primary
importance in parties which are
more-or-less status quo. These claims
of personal leadership are further
complicated by the very natural ma-
neuvering of the present CDU and
Democratic party top committees to
establish themselves in a favorable
position pending approval of national
political parties.
HE first efforts to extend the lines
of the developing national parties
into an over-all quasi-representative
German body failed last month when
Dr. Schumacher, the SPD leader, re-
jected suggestions of the CDU that a
four-party committee be set up to dis-
cuss the peace terms and make a Ger-
man contribution to the Moscow con-
ference. In Dr. Schumacher's view
such a committee could be set up
only when the parties were licensed
in all the zones under free democra-
tic conditions; such a view-point may
also indicate the attitude of the SPD
towards participation in future Ger-
man central agencies or a provisional
In this connection the problem of
the participation of German parties
in the apparatus of German govern-
ment is one which appears to be con-
cerning more and more political lead-
ers, especially in the SPD. Some So-
cial-Democrats have expressed the
view that the SPD should withdraw
from all Land cabinets, basing their
attitude on the alleged impossibility
of realizing socialism in a disunited
Germany, the impossibility of accept-
ing responsibility for affairs in Ger-
many today under military occu-
pation ("... total victory is total re-
sponsibility...," and the political un-
desirability of having the SPD saddled
with the collaborationist label when,
as, and if the occupying powers leave
Germany. The large group, especially
the party bureaucracy, the office-hold-
ers, and the older party leaders,
seem willing to maintain the present
position, at least for the time being.
The status-quo organizations (CDU
and Democratic) are much less affect-
ed by this type of thinking than the
SPD, but any action by the latter
would place a great extra burden on
the non-Marxist parties. Since the
KPD would almost certainly join any
Social-Democratic movement of this
nature, if only to add fuel to the
fire, government would become a pro-
vince of the non-Socialists.

Go up to Top of Page