Page View
Fisher, Paul / Works councils in Germany
([1951])
Works council- a factor in union weakness, pp. 28-32
PDF (2.3 MB)
Page 28
- 28 - TeORKS CCUN:CIL - A FACTOR IN UNION WEAKNESS? To those who give unreserved support to the union as the only effective form of labor organization, the foregoing account would appear to amount to a severe indictment of the works council. But are these dangers specific works council problems? Are the Anglo- American unions which have been spared the necessity of adjusting themselves to legally-commanded works councils immune to dual and rival unionism? Would it not seem as if American.unions also have to fight off communism and that they had met the identical problems with the very same methods which have been detailed here? American communists have been quite successful in the past in capturing shop steward positions, union office in locals and intermediate organizations and, at times, entire national and international unions. Group egotism is by no means a monopoly of the Germans. There are many recorded cases where U.S. locals, to save the jobs and pay of their members, clashed with national union policy. In the depression, for instance, many American locals agreed to or acquiesced in wage rates below the collective bargaining rate. Control of the international union over some locals was often remote. Disciplinary action, expulsion, revocation of charters and sequestration of funds were rarely taken when depression - the period when locals are most likely to turn company-minded and to stray from the path of union policy - depleted union ranks and treasuries. The dangers just discussed are, of course, ever present. They confront organized labor everywhere and can only be overcome by a vigilant and strong labor movement. .'that is lacking in the German labor movement is not vigilance but union strength. For a number of reasons, all clearly recognized by the DGB, the German unions are until now by no means as strong as they appear at first glance. The magnificent organizational record of over 5,000,000 members out of about l4,CCO,COO employed in the respective fields is offset by considerable internal weakness. Fortunately, most of the causes of this weakness are only temporary. The weakness is partly a consequence of the Nazi regime which has led to a lack of leadership and to membership apathy. Much of the present-day leadership is superannuated. Only 30 percent of the present membership had the experience of a free democratic labor movement. Too many of the unionists of that period have been obliterated by Nazism, war and natural death. The other 70 percent knew only the frozen state-decreed wages of the Nazi period, and Dr. Ley's sham labor front. These younger workers are sceptical. distrustful of all organizations, be they unions or political groups. To them the DGB is not so greatly different from the compulsory German Labor Front (LAF). Besides distrust and apathy, there is the fear that any pronounced
As a work of the United States government, this material is in the public domain.| For information on re-use see: http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/Copyright