Page View
United States. Office of the US High Commissioner for Germany. Information Services Division / RIAS, Berlin
([195-])
Economics commentary by Dr. Anton Schoepke, pp. 39-42
PDF (1.7 MB)
Page 39
- 38 - SampleCCommentary (October 2y, 1952) by Dr. Anton Schoepke. director of the Borsig Works at Berlin-Tegel who delivers a weekly "Current Economics Report" over RIAS. "There are two approaches to the socio-economic situation: on the one hand, striving for a balance between the highest possible gross national product and economic possibilities and requirements; on the other hand, placing a social dream picture before a reality and then demanding that reality conform with the dream picture. It need not be said that the first approach, in the province of the economist, can be most unpopular, whereas the second approach will find approval much easier. In this con- nection it should not be disregarded that the concept of a dream- picture actually often does influence economic reality up to a certain degree and moreover awakens fertile and positive thoughts and forces. However, it depends on the degree.. "It is an old truism that the whole science of economics is a function of scarcity. Where there is no scarcity there is no need for ap- plying economics. Air is no item for economics principles and water only to a limited degree - in areas where there is no shortage of water - with regard to water transport, sewage, etc., while in desert areas water is an item which does call for the application of economic principles. Scar- city means that there is an upper limit to sharing of the goods of this earth. The possibilities can only be enlarged by increasing the produc- tion of the scarce goods. If this does not happen, an increased share in the material goods can only be brought about at the expense of other in- dividuals or groups. This sober statement also limits all socio-economic possibilities. A larger share in the "social product' can only be achieved in an economy by increasing the gross national product or' by changing its distribution. Obviously a combination of both will accomplish the same. To use an old example: if slmebody cuts a larger slice of a pie than originally provided, the other pie eaters will have to do with smaller slices. However, if a larger pie is baked all consumers will be able to eat mote. On the other hand nothing is gained if I should choose to re- name /6 of the pie and call it 2/12. This portion does sound more im- pressive but in accordance with basic arithmetic 1/6 is equal to 2/12 and 4/24 etc., etc. - 39 -
As a work of the United States government, this material is in the public domain.| For information on re-use see: http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/Copyright