Page View
United States. Office of the US High Commissioner for Germany / Germany's parliament in action; the September 1949 debate on the government's statement of policy
([1950])
Clausen, Hermann
Comment on the statement of policy of the German federal government delivered in the Bundestag on 22 September 1949 by Hermann Clausen of the South Schleswig Electoral League, p. 91
Page 91
Comment on the Statement of Policy of the German Federal Government delivered in the Bundestag on 22 September 1949 by Hermann Clausen of the South Schleswig Electoral League (Stidschleswigsche Wahlervereinigung - SSW) As representative of the smallest recognized political party, the SSW (South Schleswig Electoral League), and at the same time as representative of the Danish-thinking part of the popullation in South Schleswig, permit me to say a few words about the Government's Statement of Policy. After election of the Federal Chancellor, I real- ized what significance a small party, even a one- man Party Delegation, may have in parliamentary life. A newspaper reported that it had learned from the well-known reliable sources that Clausen of SSW had cast the 202nd vote for Dr. Adenauer. I was almost saddled with the entire responsibility. By the way, this amusing allegation is incorrect, if only because I was unable to attend the plenary session in question. THE PLATFORM OF SSW Nor is the newspaper report correct that I joined CDUJ. In other words, I am not a member of the governmental Coalition. As representative of the Danish-thinking part of the population, or, if you prefer, of the Danish minority in South Schleswig, my attitude towards the Federal Government is open-minded. It will be influenced by the degree to which the Federal Government will comply with the wishes and alleviate the difficulties of this South Schleswig border area. There may be objec- tions to the discussion, within the framework of this debate, of problems concerning one segment of the Federal Republic. However, the members of my political organization and my constituents are confined to the border area of South Schleswig. I therefore ask this House to bear with me. The Federal Chancellor mentioned a fairer distribution of expellees among the various Lander. By this time it has become well-known that South Schleswig - and as a Landtag member I also speak for Holstein - suffers most from the pres- sure of overpopulation. For that reason I would like to tell the Government from this rostrum: not only the equalization of financial burdens is an urgent necessity, the equalization of population is just as essential. Tackle a fair distribution of ex- pellees seriously and speedily! In that way you will render a service not only to the native population, which suffers from this overpopulation, but also to the expellees who will never to be able to make a living in our border area, and who cannot find apprenticeship positions or work for their children. At the same time you will eliminate an injustice done to South Schleswig. SELF-DETERMINATION FOR SOUTH SCHLESWIG Much has been said about the borders of the Federal Republic, in the Government's Statement of Policy and probably in the debate also. I miss one thing, though. Nothing was said about a border population's right of self-determination. We do demand this right in our platform. The Atlantic Charter is explicit with regard to it. This right of self-determination, and the right to work for the implementation of this right by democratic means, are part and parcel of the most basic democratic principles and foundations of human rights. The future will show whether the Government will have to take care of minority rights in border areas. In our section, the Land Government of Schleswig-'Holstein is concerning itself with that matter and we do hope that it will be settled satisfactorily. Should the Federal Government assume the task of caring for minority rights in the border areas, I would ask it to be generous and to lay down rights that actually correspond to the demands of liberty. Such rights should be above the petty pinpricks of chicanery that were so common in the past. In solving the problems of border areas, where different cultures overlap, a government may best prove that it takes democracy seriously. ADMINISTRATIVE AUTONOMY FOR SOUTH SCHLESWIG I will also mention that administrative autonomy for South Schleswig is one of the prerequisites of complete liberty in our border Barea, a prerequisite demanded by my organization in its platform. We believe that the three existing cultures - German, Danish and Friesian - can develop equally and with complete freedom only under self-administra- tion. This should have been taken into account when the Lander were formed. Even Prussia repeatedly considered the advisability of making the area of South Schleswig a separate Admin- istrative District. Nothing was ever done about it. From the historical point of view this demand is justified. To preclude any misinterpretation, I wish to conclude with the assurance that you will find the Danish-thinking part of Siouth Schleswig's population, and myself as their elected represen- tative, wherever the principles of democracy are to be cultivated, implemented and defended. 91
As a work of the United States government, this material is in the public domain.| For information on re-use see: http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/Copyright