Page View
Documents on Germany, 1944-1959 : background documents on Germany, 1944-1959, and a chronology of political developments affecting Berlin, 1945-1956
(1959)
Note from the foreign minister of the Federal Republic of Germany (von Brentano) to the Soviet Ambassador (Smirnov), regarding nuclear weapons in Germany, May 23, 1957 [extracts], pp. 205-206
PDF (822.5 KB)
Page 205
DOCUMENTS ON GERMANY, 1944-59 Q. Does that rule out that pilot area for central Europe that has been discussed as a test for inspection and other devices for security? A. Well, as I said in answer to an earlier question, we do not ex- clude the possibility of having such a zone in Europe. If there is such a zone in Europe, it would have to be worked out in cooperation with NATO, with the Federal Republic. There are very considerable complications about that, so that in line with the policy which I enunciated in my New York speech of a month or so ago, where I said that progress will probably have to be taken by steps, carefully measured and carefully taken, it may be that that is not the best place to start because of the complications. Q. Mr. Secretary, in your mind is the German reunification and any disarmament reached in Europe, still the two factors that must be resolved at the same time, pretty closely related? A. I think it is very difficult to work out an effective and depend- able limitation of armanent arrangements for Germany which is not connected somewhat with the reunification of Germany. As I indi- cated before, our views in that respect would be very largely in- fluenced by the views of the German authorities themselves, particu- larly Chancellor Adenauer. I don't say it is impossible, but I would think that their judgment would carry a great deal of weight in that matter. Q, I was thinking more of a general disarmament in Europe. Is that in your mind linked with the problem of German reunification? In other words, would we reach a limited disarmament agreement with the Russians without at the same time insisting some progress be made on-the German problems? A. Well, that again I don't want to answer without consultation with the Germans. I think their views are entitled to a great deal of weight. * * * * * * * Note from the Foreign Minister of the Federal Republic of Ger- many (von Brentano) to the Soviet Ambassador (Smirnov), Regarding Nuclear Weapons in Germany, May 23,19571 [Extracts] The frightful dangers of atomic warfare have not been conjured up by the Federal Republic of Germany, which is known not to belong to the Powers possessing or manufacturing or testing atomic and hy- drogen weapons. The statements by the Soviet Government that there may either now or at some future date be claimed to exist a concentration of atomic weapons in the territory of the Federal Republic, or a conver- sion of the Federal Republic into the main European assembly base and main striking power of NATO for atomic warfare in Europe are completely erroneous. There is not a shred of evidence to support them. 1 German Federal Press and Information Offlce Bulletin, May 28, 19,57. 205
This material may be protected by copyright law (e.g., Title 17, US Code).| For information on re-use see: http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/Copyright