Page View
Chambers, Ephraim, 1680 (ca.)-1740 / Cyclopædia, or, An universal dictionary of arts and sciences : containing the definitions of the terms, and accounts of the things signify'd thereby, in the several arts, both liberal and mechanical, and the several sciences, human and divine : the figures, kinds, properties, productions, preparations, and uses, of things natural and artificial : the rise, progress, and state of things ecclesiastical, civil, military, and commercial : with the several systems, sects, opinions, &c : among philosophers, divines, mathematicians, physicians, antiquaries, criticks, &c : the whole intended as a course of antient and modern learning
(1728)
The preface, pp. I [i]-xxx
PDF (27.2 MB)
Page xxv
The P R E FAX C E xxv whence arife the Crafis, Colour, Heat, Specific Gravity, &c. of Blood; Writers don't ordinarily trouble them- felves. I F, by the Artifice abovementioned, we get free of a vaft load of plebeian Words, which muff have greatly incumber'd us ; the Grammar and Analogy of Language difiengages us from a ftill greater number of all kinds. The various States of the fame Word, confider'd as it comes under different Parts of Speech, and accordingly affumes different Terminations, increafes the Lift of Terms immenfely : as, in Dark, Dark- neji, Darkning; Projef, Projefion, Projealle, Projeilive, &c. which may either be confider'd as one and the fame Word under different Habitudes ; in regard there is a common Subifratum of them all; or, as fo many different Terms ; in regard every one takes in fomething not contained in the other. - This Lati- tude we make ufe of occafionally; and either confider the Words this way or that, as feems moft advanta- geous to our purpofe. In fome Cafes, where the Alteration is merely grammatical, we content our felves to explain 'em in one flate, e. g. Shearing; and fuppofe the Reader able, by Grammar to form the reft, as Shorn, &c. In others, where feveral particular Ideas are arbitrarily fuperadded to the Word in one Part of Speech, which do not belong to it in another, we there explain it in all: as, Precipitate, Precipitant, Precipi- tation, &c. T HI S gives an occafion to mention a firange kind of Licenfe frequently praaftis'd in our Language. Tho there be ordinarily a great deal of difference between the feveral States or Modifications of the fame Word, e. g. Reftefing, Reflexion, Reflexible, &c. the fame as between the Ac'tion and Quality, the Power and the Exercife of it in this or that Cafe, the Caufe and the Effect; yet Authors make no difficulty of ufing 'em promifcuoufly: which would make downright Nonfenfe, were the Readers to keep to the ftri6t import of the Words. But the Truth is, we are not fo critical about the Matter; if the Meaning come within our reach we jump at it, and are glad to take it ; without waiting to fee whether it would reach us in its prefent Direction, or whether it might not rather fall mhort, or fly by us. What Confufion fhould we make, even in our beft and cleareft Wri- ters, were we refolved not to underfiand 'em but according to the ftricft Rules of Grammar, and not indulge 'em the petty liberty of ufing quid pro quo, one part of Speech for another ? In a thoufand Cafes, the fame Idea is denoted by oppofite Terms: Thus, we fay, fuch a Medicine is good for, or again]t the Worms, Plague, &c. IT may be urged, that as Cuftom has authoriz'd this latitudinarian Pracftice, it is become of grammatical Authority ; and that as the Licenfe is known, it can't deceive us ; fince the Readers are led on fuch occafions to relax the Bands of Grammar, and annul the difference between the Parts of Speech, in order to admit one a fubftitute for another.-But I am afraid this expedient fcarce indemnifies us from the Abufe. Befides the extraordinary embarrass of reading what is thus promifcuoufly wrote, 'tis not always we know when and how to fuperfede the ftri&t import of an Author's Words, and make him fpeak Senfe in his own defpite. This I take to be none of the leaft occafions of Controverfy and Difpute owing to Language, and which we may almoft defpair of feeing reCtified, unlefs in a new one. I S H A L L not here enter upon the Merits and Defefts of the Englijh Tongue, confidered as a Language: A great deal has been faid on that Head by others, for which the Reader may turn to the proper Article in the DiCtionary it felf. This Place we referve, not for other Peoples Notions, but our own; and what we have to add, will be chiefly as it ftands with regard to Art, and more particularly to a Diaionary of Arts. I B ELI 'EVE none will queftion but we met with Difficulties enough in the Courfe of this Work. The very Bulk - and Dimenfions of it confefs as much, and the Variety and Uncertainty of its Matter ftill more. But thefe were in fome fort natural Difficulties, and ought to be confider'd as neceflarily appendent to the very Effence of the Defign; and therefore did not afflict us fo much as thofe that rofe from it at fecond hand, or were fuperadded to it, as it were, by Accident. And fuch was the prefent wild State of our Language, which alone were fufficient to have baffled the beft Scheme, and broke thro' the beft Meafures that could be form'd. W E have already reprefented Language as fomething very important; and as having a near and neceffary intereft in Knowledge. Names, we here add, are folemn things, as they are Reprefentatives of Ideas themfelves, and ufed on moft occasions in their ftead: and Terms, or Combinations of Ideas, are ftill more fo; as much as complex Engines, are of farther and nicer Confideration than the fimple mechanic Powers. But who would imagine this, to confider the wanton ufe we make of 'em ; and with how little Fear, or Difcretion, Words are treated among us ? Every body think themfelves privileg'd to alter, or fet afide the old, and introduce new ones at pleafure. England is open to all Nations, at leaft in this refpeit; and our Traders in this Commodity, import their Wares from every Country in all fecurity. The mercantile Humour feems to have pofleffed every Part of us, fo that we are not only unwilling to be without the natural Produce of our Neighbours Countries, but we even envy 'em their Fafhions, their Follies, and their Words. Scarce a petty Author that appears, but makes his Innovations : But when a Dictionary comes out, 'tis like an EaJ? India Fleet, and you are fure of a huge Cargo. The Effec't is, that our Language is, and will continue in a perpetual flux; and no body knows whether he is mafter of it or no. The utmoft he can fay, is, that he had it for fuch a Day, exciufive of what has happen'd fince. A M A N never knows when he is at the end of the Terms, e. g. in Architec'ture. When he has got two or three Names, for fome one Member, and thinks himfelf overftock'd, 'tis odds he has not half. 'Tis not enough he knows what it is named in the Englijh; but he muft likewife learn what the French, Italians, Latins, and Greeks, likewife call it, or frequently find himfelf at a ftand. Thus it is in the Cafe of Fillets, Li./s, Lij- tels, Reglets, Platbands, Bandeletts, 'Tonias, and Baguettes; of Chaplets, Aftragals, Batoons, and !rores; of Gulas, Gueules, Doucines, Cimas, Cymatiums, Ogees, and Talons; Ovums, Ovolos, Echinus's, Zuarter-rounds, Boultins, &c. between which, there is no known, allowed differences; but they are either ufed indifcriminately, or diftinguiffi'd arbitrarily; one Perfon making this diftinution, and the next another, or perhaps none at all. So that if we come ftrictly to DiCtionaries, we fhould have a different one for every Author. BUT the Mifchief does not end here: for as the antient Arts are in many refpects different from the mo- dern; the ufe of their Terms neceffarily involves us in a new Confufion, and makes the fame Word ftand in an ancient Author for one thing, and in a modern for another. Thus it is in Parajtata, Orthoftata, Anta, &c. In effect, there is that Alteration continually making in the Language of Archite~ture, that there ought, in Pro- priety, to be a different Dictionary of it for every different Age. T H E Truth is, a fourth part of the Words in fome of our popular Diotionaries, ftand on no better Autho- rity, than the lingle PraCtice of fome one fanciful Author; who having an intemperate Defire to fhew either his Learning or Breeding, has met with Di~tionary-Writers fond enough to take his Fripperies off his hands, and expofe 'em to the Publick for legitimate Goods. By fuch means, thefe Exotics have obtain'd a kind of Curren- cy; fo that a DiEtionary would be thought defeCtive without 'em. To omit even our Fopperies would be thought a Failing ; and might even be efteemed by many as the moft unpardonable of all.-On thefe ac- counts we have been oblig'd to temporife a little, how much foever againft our Will; and thus perhaps have g contributed
Based on date of publication, this material is presumed to be in the public domain.| For information on re-use, see: http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/Copyright