Page View
Bureau of Mines / Minerals yearbook area reports: domestic 1972
Year 1972, Volume 2 (1972)
Moore, Lyman
Arizona, pp. 71-95 ff.
PDF (2.7 MB)
Page 75
THE MINERAL INDUSTRY OF ARIZONA grams per cubic meter by 1974. The status of operating and partially constructed sulfur removal facilities at Arizona smelters at yearend 1972 was as follows: At the Douglas facility, new emission collecting equipment being installed would allow the smelter to operate at 58% capacity. Only short-term pollution control expenditures are economically justifiable at this 65-yearold plant. Morenci facilities installed or under construction should recover 70% of the sulfur. Ajo facilities under construction should recover 90% of the sulfur. Hayden (Kennecott Copper Corp.) facilities installed or under construction should recover 90% of the sulfur. Hayden (American Smelting and Refining Company) facilities now operating recover 55% of the sulfur, and a higher stack was being built and a new sulfur dioxide monitoring network was being installed. Inspiration facilities under construction should recover over 90% of the sulfur. San Manuel facilities under construction should recover 70% of the sulfur. Sulfur removal equipment at the coal burning Mohave, Nev., powerplant removed 90% of contained sulfur during test runs; however, excessive deposition of sulfates in the scrubbers remains a problem. Enabling legislation was passed by the State allowing local governmental agencies to financially assist private pollution abatement programs, thus allowing pollution control to be financed by tax-exempt loans. However, pollution facilities installed will be taxed by local and State - jurisdictions on exactly the same basis as existing production facilities. The first loan granted under this act was for $30 million from the Industrial Authority of Pinal County to Newmont Mining Corp. for pollution control to be installed at the San Manuel smelter. The constitutionality of the enabling law was questioned but was upheld in a May 1973 ruling of the Arizona Supreme Court. Bureau of Mines engineers are studying ground breakage and movement during undercut stoping to obtain information for developing more efficient mining methods. Data are being collected in a test blockcaving stope, being mined by Phelps Dodge Corp., to determine mining characteristics of the Safford ore deposit. Advanced measuring instruments are used to record ground movement resulting from the stoping. Bureau engineers also studied blasting techniques to break ore bodies for in situ leaching. Test blasts were made using various drill hole spacings in an Arizona porphyry copper deposit. Core drilling was used to obtain samples of rock before and after blasting for fragmentation evaluations. Bureau metallurgists are studying methods for recovering copper from screened Arizona mine waste. The higher grade fine fraction is considered a promising - source of concentration or vat leaching feed. The coarse material yields a higher copper recovery by dump leaching than unscreened waste, because circulation impeding fines have been removed. Metallurgical research was also done on agitation leaching of copper silicate ores. Studies continued on tailings dam stabilization and On prevention of surface water pollution from drainage of tailings impoundments and waste dumps. The U.S. Geological Survey and the Bureau of Mines studied the:mineral potential of the proposed Chiricahua Wilderness Area in Cochise County and the Galiuro Wilderness Area in Graham County. REVIEW BY MINERAL COMMODITIES METALS Copper production continued to dominate Arizona metal mining activity. Thirty-three mines produced copper ore or siicious fluxing material containing low values in gold, silver, and copper. Copper-zinc ore was produced at one mine, lead-zinc ore at one mine, iron at one mine, and tungsten ore at one mine. Copper.—Arizona mines produced 908,612 tons of copper, 11% more than in 1971 (when strikes idled most plants for 1 to 2 months) and only 1% below the record 1970 production. Thirty-three mines reported copper production. Of these, 16 mined principally concentrating ore, 5 leaching ore, 3 both concentrating and leaching ore, 5 direct smelting ore, and 4 low-grade silicious fluxing ore. Tailings containing copper were shipped from one property for flux. Cleanup material was shipped to smeltera from five mines or plants. Of the total copper production 783,918 tons was recovered from 153.09 million tons of ore treated by concentration, 57,482 tons from 12.45 million tons of ore treated by vat or
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/| As a work of the United States government, this material is in the public domain.| For information on re-use see: http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/Copyright