Page View
Kamarck, Edward (ed.) / Arts in society: growth of dance in America
(Summer-Fall, 1976)
Jacobs, Ellen W.
The dancer: [why everybody suddenly loves dance], pp. 266-[271]
PDF (6.2 MB)
Page 267
why everybody suddenl loves dance political hero, lending him an aura rarely enjoyed by serious American artists. He became an instant name not only by virtue of the drama of his dancing but also by virtue of the drama of his life. In addition, there was his on-stage love affair with Margot Fonteyn, the legend-making rap- port between an older woman and a young tiger. His partnership was supposed to have inspired her to new life, to even greater artistic heights. The couple aroused our curiosity, fed our imaginations and helped fill our famous need for glamorous stars. Nureyev, yes. But it is also important to con- sider when the phenomenon of Nureyev came about. For the answer to the question of why America is suddenly interested in dance is inextricably linked to when America became interested. Nureyev's arrival in the sixties coincided with changes in the whole social and moral climate of America, changes that made an acceptance of dance possible for the first time in our country's history. The war in Vietnam, America's economic affluence, the fear of nuclear annihilation, and the growing threat of a computerized and faceless society each played its own role in forcing us to seriously question principles which we had always considered givens. Political, economic and moral assumptions underwent severe scrutiny. It was during this period that America finally began to loosen her chastity belt. What used to go on behind closed doors guiltily was now going public proudly. America was shedding the skins of her puritanical past, a past that had religiously taught its children to divide themselves into three separate parts: mind, body and spirit. Flesh was naturally evil and a source of shame. A concern with and dis- play of the body had traditionally met with severe criticism or, at best, with nervous snickers. It seems reasonable then, if not almost too obvious, that an art form dependent on the body for expression, an art whose message is articulated by the body would threaten the very moral fiber of the nation's conscience. No matter how pristine the ballet, how virginal the ballerina or gallant the danseur, dance is about the body, the body as it moves in space and time, but nonetheless, the body. Our eyes are focused on the legs, arms, torso, neck and back as the dancer dips, turns, runs, leaps. No matter how sexually innocent the movement, it still stirs a sensual response in its audience. Dance certainly is not always about sex or even love, but it is always sensual, and appre- ciation of it requires an unrepressed spirit, an ability to transcend our trained prejudice against the animal responses of our muscles. It is only through kinesthetic empathy-a 267
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/| Copyright, 1976, by the Regents of the University of Wisconsin.| For information on re-use, see http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/Copyright