Page View
Hayman, David / The "Wake" in transit
(1990)
Introduction, pp. 1-17
Page 1
Introduction I No, so holp me Petault, it is not a miseffectual whyacinthinous riot of blots and blurs and bars and balls and hoops and wriggles and juxtaposed jottings linked by spurts of speed: it only looks as like it as danm it; and, sure, we ought really to rest thankful that at this deleteful hour of dungflies dawning we have even a written on with dried ink scrap of paper at all to show for ourselves. . The warped flooring of the lair and soundconducting walls thereof, to say nothing of the uprights and imposts, were persianly literatured with burst loveletters, telltale stories, stickyback snaps, doubtful eggshells, bouchers, flints, borers, puffers, amygdaloid almonds, rindless raisins, aiphybettyformed verbage . . . best intentions, curried notes, upset latten tintacks, unused mill and stumpling stones, twisted quills, painful digests, magnifying wineglasses, solid objects cast at goblins, once current puns, quashed quotatoes, messes of motage. . the more carrots you chop, the more turnips you slit, the more murphies you peel, the more onions you cry over, the more bulibeef you butch, the more mutton you crackerhack, the more potherbs you pound, the fiercer the fire and the longer your spoon and the harder you gruel with more grease to your elbow the merrier fumes your new Irish stew. —Finnegans Wake ii8, 183, 190 Though not precisely the full recipe, the Joyce papers in London and Buffalo come astonishingly close to reconstituting both
Copyright © 1990 by Cornell University.| For information on re-use see: http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/Copyright




