Page View
Keeling, Ralph Franklin, 1901- / Gruesome harvest
(1947)
Chapter IV - the attack against German capital, pp. 38-52
PDF (5.2 MB)
Page 49
THE ATTACK AGAINST GERMAN CAPITAL flow of reparations to the Soviet Union. Many of Germany's greatest producers of civilian goods were dismantled and shipped eastward. Among them were the two largest shoe factories (Lingel and Tack); the largest sugar refineries in the great beet-sugar region; the largest grain processing mills in Europe, at Barby near Magdeburg; the great Bemberg Silk Mills, famous before the war for their hosiery and lingerie, and the Zeiss Optical Works at Jena. All secondary rail lines were torn up and all electric locomotives removed from the zone. But many of the confiscated plants were left in Germany where they could be operated by Germans for Russia's bene- fit. She installed Russian or Communist foremen and placed Russians or Communists on the Boards of Directors. In this fashion she acquired complete ownership and control of 200 of Germany's key industries comprising the zone's real eco- nomic wealth and employing 1,300,000 workers-a third of the zone's working population. Examples of the industries seized are all of the I. G. Farben Industrie plants in Saxony, including the famous Leuna chemical factories at Merseburg, Bitterfeld, and Wollin; the Reich's only important copper works, the Mansfield Co., in Saxony; the machine works of Krupp Gruson at Magdeburg; the Brabag Brown Coal and Gasoline Co., near Gera in Thuringia; the Polysius machine works at Dessau; and many of the most important iron ore plants, machine tool factories, coal mine companies, potash mines, and electrical plants. America, which from the beginning had been the most zeal- ous in carrying out de-industrialization in its own zone, made no protest to Russia until it was learned that two establish- ments owned by American concerns, the United Shoe Ma- chinery Co. and the Corn Products Refining Co., had been among those seized. We then offered the suggestion that Allied owned property should be exempted from seizure and added the pious thought that plants producing civilian goods should be kept in Germany. Our note went unanswered. It is known, however, that Russia has invented numerous ex- cuses to give her seizures apparent legality, among them being the contention that plants with international backing are
Copyright, 1947, by Institute of American Economics. All rights reserved.| For information on re-use see: http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/Copyright




