Page View
United States Department of State / Foreign relations of the United States : diplomatic papers : the Conference of Berlin (the Potsdam Conference), 1945
(1945)
Appendix a. Miko_ajczyk notes on a meeting of the Foreign Ministers and on Polish-American and Polish-Soviet conversations at the Berlin conference, pp. 1517-1542
PDF (8.9 MB)
Page 1518
APPENDICES Government in answer to our invitation? I should like to ask President Bierut to name the speaker who will present to us the posi- tion of the Polish Government. PRESIDENT BIERUT: (Expresses thanks for the invitation to the Conference and begins the report.) In connection with this World War, Poland has been placed in a situation which changes her bound- aries. Resolutions of the Crimean Conference 4 determined the eastern boundary of Poland, but the western boundary was not established. We accepted the eastern boundary in accordance with the resolutions of the Crimean Conference and the Moscow Confer- ence.5 Our government would like to express its opinion with regard to the western boundary of Poland. I should like to point out that the Government of National Unity has unanimously arrived at the following conclusions: we should all like to ask, when our western borders are established, that there be taken into consideration the vital interests of Poland, i. e., the factors without which Poland will not be able to exist. Poland is a state which became the object of German aggression. As a result of this war Poland has suffered the most heavily in popula- tion and material of all the states participating in the war. Our country was damaged more than any other country in this war. We realize that in order to establish a lasting peace in all Europe Poland, which suffered great losses in the war for that peace, must also make certain common sacrifices at this time, in the same way as other nations. From the territorial standpoint, Poland had to give up an area of 180,000 square kilometers in establishing her eastern boundary. We consider it proper and just that the eastern boundary was estab- lished in accordance with ethnic principles. I believe that the equiv- alent which Poland should receive in accordance with the decisions of the Big Three should include such a territorial increase as would guarantee to Poland a boundary appropriate from the standpoint of security as well as an area which would be a compact unit from the standpoint of economy and defense of the state. In our plan we drew up precisely such a boundary, based in the north on Swinemiinde, which gives Stettin to Poland and runs along the Oder and the Neisse to the Czechoslovak border.6 It is true that from the territorial standpoint the establishment of such a boundary would return to Poland less than what Poland has lost in the east, but from the economic standpoint it would guarantee better conditions for develop- ment. The total area of Poland would be reduced from 380,000 square kilometers to 309,000 square kilometers, i. e., by approxi- mately 70,000 square kilometers. From the demographic standpoint 4 See document No. 1417, section VI. 5 See vol. i, document No. 493. 5 See vol. i, document No. 517 See also the map facing p. 1152 in this volume. 1518
As a work of the United States government, this material is in the public domain.| For information on re-use see: http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/Copyright




