Page 95

95
violation of good taste, I am convinced that they are, and must
be distinct objects, and ought never to be brought together in
the same point of view.
To guard against misrepresentation, let me be allowed
to say, each may fill its appropriate station in a gentleman's
estate: we do not wish to banish the nectarine from our desserts,
although we plant out the wall which protects it; norwould I
expunge the common farm from the pleasures of the country,
though I cannot encourage its motley hues, and domestic ocu-
pations, to disturb the repose of park scenery. It is the union,
not the existence, of beauty and profit, of laborious exertion and
pleasurable recreation, against which I would interpose the
influence of my art; nor let the fastidious objector condemn the
effort, till he can convince the judgment, that without violation
of good taste he could introduce the dairy and the pigsty (those
useful appendages of rural economy) into the recesses of the
drawing room, or the area of the saloon.
The difficulty of uniting a park and a farm arises from
this material circumstance, that the one is an object of
beauty, the other of profit.   The scenery of both consists
of Ground, Trees, Water, and Cattle; but these are very dif-
ferently arranged. And since a park is less profitable than
arable land, the more we can diminish the quantity of the
former, provided it still be in character with the style of
the mansion, the less we shall regret the sacrifice of profit to
beauty.
The shape and colour of corn fields, and the straight lines
of fences, are so totally at variance with all ideas of picturesque
beauty, that I shall not venture to suggest any hints on the